Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
Cincinnati, OH 63 46.32%
St. Louis, MO 29 21.32%
Milwaukee, WI 44 32.35%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2020, 12:33 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMatl View Post
I think it probably does have higher density where buildable land exists, it's dense there for sure. The numbers will never tell the entire story though, due to their geography. A lot of the City is simply too hilly to build on, but that also makes it the prettiest of these 3.
I posted city density numbers, and said, as well, that Milwaukee is one of the highest density cities in the Midwest. I also posted numbers. I would disagree in the "prettiest", as Milwaukee is on a lake, that looks like an ocean. It also has a river that runs through downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2020, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,919,548 times
Reputation: 9986
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
I posted city density numbers, and said, as well, that Milwaukee is one of the highest density cities in the Midwest. I also posted numbers. I would disagree in the "prettiest", as Milwaukee is on a lake, that looks like an ocean. It also has a river that runs through downtown.
And I disagree. Cincy has a large River and a beautiful, hilly urban setting that Milwaukee simply can't match. It is also just as structurally dense if not moreso than Milwaukee where there is buildable land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 02:31 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMatl View Post
And I disagree. Cincy has a large River and a beautiful, hilly urban setting that Milwaukee simply can't match. It is also just as structurally dense if not moreso than Milwaukee where there is buildable land.
I guess I prefer Lake Michigan to a river...which Milwaukee, also, has, right through downtown.


https://www.google.com/search?q=milw...w=1920&bih=969
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 02:59 PM
 
509 posts, read 432,607 times
Reputation: 1539
I have been to both and both are beautiful cities with beautiful geographic settings. Definitely both are far more appealing to me than say Atlanta, Raleigh, or Charlotte.

As for density, Here is what I cam up with for the urban core density of each city.

Milwaukee has 40,585 in the Greater Downtown Area as identified by this study (https://www.milwaukeedowntown.com/si...stimates_1.pdf). I calculated the area of that in Google Maps Area Calculator and came up with 3.20 square miles. This comes out to 12,682 people per square mile. East Side has the highest density with 18,520 people in 0.87 square miles (21,290 per square mile).

For Cincinnati, I looked at zip codes 45202 (CBD, OTR, Pendleton, and Mt Adams) and 45219 (University of Cincinnati and Clifton Heights) which together make up the densest part of Cincinnati. I excluded the hills and major parks like Eden park and used the 2018 ESRI/Census population estimates found here (http://vdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/web...f8c3882b7ceb18) which came out to 35,547 people in 3.60 square miles. This comes out to 9,874 people per square mile. OTR has the highest density with 6,692 people in 0.43 square miles (15,472 per square mile).

This is good density for both cities. Greater downtown Milwaukee grew from 32,454 in 2010 to 40,585 in 2019 (2.78% per year) while those two zip codes in Cincinnati grew from 30,748 in 2010 to 35,547 in 2018 (1.95% per year).

Obviously though these are just estimates and we won't know for sure until the 2020 Census results come out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,919,548 times
Reputation: 9986
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
I guess I prefer Lake Michigan to a river...which Milwaukee, also, has, right through downtown.


https://www.google.com/search?q=milw...w=1920&bih=969
Yes, I am aware there is a River there. It pales in comparison to the Ohio River, though. It more resembles an industrial canal than a scenic river.

I'm assuming by your comments that you've never been to Cincinnati.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,919,548 times
Reputation: 9986
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcook1 View Post
I have been to both and both are beautiful cities with beautiful geographic settings. Definitely both are far more appealing to me than say Atlanta, Raleigh, or Charlotte.

As for density, Here is what I cam up with for the urban core density of each city.

Milwaukee has 40,585 in the Greater Downtown Area as identified by this study (https://www.milwaukeedowntown.com/si...stimates_1.pdf). I calculated the area of that in Google Maps Area Calculator and came up with 3.20 square miles. This comes out to 12,682 people per square mile. East Side has the highest density with 18,520 people in 0.87 square miles (21,290 per square mile).

For Cincinnati, I looked at zip codes 45202 (CBD, OTR, Pendleton, and Mt Adams) and 45219 (University of Cincinnati and Clifton Heights) which together make up the densest part of Cincinnati. I excluded the hills and major parks like Eden park and used the 2018 ESRI/Census population estimates found here (http://vdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/web...f8c3882b7ceb18) which came out to 35,547 people in 3.60 square miles. This comes out to 9,874 people per square mile. OTR has the highest density with 6,692 people in 0.43 square miles (15,472 per square mile).

This is good density for both cities. Greater downtown Milwaukee grew from 32,454 in 2010 to 40,585 in 2019 (2.78% per year) while those two zip codes in Cincinnati grew from 30,748 in 2010 to 35,547 in 2018 (1.95% per year).

Obviously though these are just estimates and we won't know for sure until the 2020 Census results come out.

Great post, thanks for the contribution!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:09 PM
 
1,151 posts, read 1,653,746 times
Reputation: 1595
I know this isn't really what the thread is about, but it is noteworthy that St. Louis has a significantly more substantial urbanized and metropolitan area than both Milwaukee and Cincinnati, and it has all the stuff that goes with having a more robust population:

Urbanized Area population (2010)

20 St. Louis, MO–IL: 2,150,706
30 Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN: 1,624,827
35 Milwaukee, WI: 1,376,476

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...es_urban_areas


Metropolitan Area population (2018 estimate)

20 St. Louis, MO-IL MSA: 2,805,465
29 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN MSA: 2,190,209
39 Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI MSA: 1,576,113

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...tistical_areas

I will concede that downtown STL has been punching under its weight for many decades, but STL also has a very urban and rapidly re-densifying central corridor spanning from downtown to midtown to the Central West End to Skinker/DeMun and into Clayton, all linked by rail transit. That counts for something. I don't believe either Milwaukee or Cincinnati can really compete with the urban expanse of STL.

Last edited by STLgasm; 02-06-2020 at 03:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:13 PM
 
6,772 posts, read 4,509,156 times
Reputation: 6097
Me personally, Cincinnati by far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:19 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908
I posted actual, factual numbers. Why is this hard to understand? My numbers were for city proper....nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2020, 03:21 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMatl View Post
Yes, I am aware there is a River there. It pales in comparison to the Ohio River, though. It more resembles an industrial canal than a scenic river.

I'm assuming by your comments that you've never been to Cincinnati.
I assume you didn't look at my pictures. Many, many condos, shops, restaurants along this river. Condos with boat slips. Don't want to look?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top