Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have visited both cities but I've visited Vegas many more times. I'd probably live in neither city though. San Diego is a nice place with a nice coastline. But San Diego is too expensive for a middle class person. Las Vegas is a nice place to visit for a couple days and it is REALLY hot during the summer. I don't really like the gambling culture they have over there and the people are not very friendly. The Strip is kind of dirty and crowded too. So San Diego is the better to live and raise a family in spite of the expense of living there.
Hmmm... Heaven or Hell? On the one hand, Heaven is beautiful year round, has great people, and activities. But, on the other hand, Hell is miserably hot and filled with the most despicable and pathetic qualities of the human race. Although, Lake Mead is pretty sweet if u have a nice boat.
San Diego. Las Vegas nights are way too cold. SD has beach, nice weather and stuff to do, Las Vegas is just for gambling, smoking, prostitutes and bars and parties. Kids would be bores. But SD is expensive and the job market sucks, still better than LV.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.