 |
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,627 posts, read 1,598,687 times
Reputation: 235
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo
Chicago gained population from 1990 to 2000. It remains to be seen whether it gained population from 2000 to 2010.
|
It did, but it does not change the fact that it lost 700,000 isnce 1950.
In other words, Chicago is smaller and less dense than it was 60 years ago. The city is shrinking, which is especially strange since, unlike Boston or New York, it does not have any competition in the area.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
1,459 posts, read 1,359,683 times
Reputation: 961
|
|
"Chicago and it's suburbs have been home to some of the fastest growing areas of the country", according to cencus data released 3/19/09. "Chicago had the seventh largest population increase in the country." Chicago-Area Population Grows: New Census Data
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Oak Park, IL
4,498 posts, read 6,118,634 times
Reputation: 2345
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dementor
It did, but it does not change the fact that it lost 700,000 isnce 1950.
In other words, Chicago is smaller and less dense than it was 60 years ago. The city is shrinking, which is especially strange since, unlike Boston or New York, it does not have any competition in the area.
|
So Chicago lost 20% of its population. Boston has lost 25%. Does that mean Boston is dying at a faster rate than Chicago?
PS: Holy crap! Pittsburgh has lost 50% of its population since 1950. That's almost as bad as Detroit. Maybe Pittsburgh is the next Detroit.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
|
|
100 posts, read 108,997 times
Reputation: 41
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NowInWI
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the Chicago metro had the nation's fourth fastest growing county (Kendall County). Ninety-four of the top 100 fastest growing counties were in the South or West, and the remaining six were in the Midwest. (U.S. Census Bureau News press release 3/19/09).
|
Kendall County is where Wayne and Garth are from!
It's as far from Chicago as NH is from Boston.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Belmont Gardens, Chicago
743 posts, read 602,324 times
Reputation: 359
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northEnd
Hey, that tall building on the right is where I work. If you paid attention to the photo, you could see that the sun has barely risen. Do people shop in Chicago at 7 AM?
And for the record, shopping is not one of the ways Bostonians measure the quality of any city, but clearly it is for Chicagoans.
|
Sure, the death of a major and historical downtown shopping district is no biggie to Bostonians.
Downtown Crossing still at crossroads - Boston Business Journal:
Maybe you guys can take a page from Chicago.
Chicago's pedestrian mall solution: traffic - The Boston Globe
And just for good measure, here's one on Boston's office vacancy rate.
Greater Boston vacancy rates spiked in Q1 - Boston Business Journal:
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
1,459 posts, read 1,359,683 times
Reputation: 961
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northEnd
Kendall County is where Wayne and Garth are from!
It's as far from Chicago as NH is from Boston.
|
Anyone can look at a map and see that's not true.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,627 posts, read 1,598,687 times
Reputation: 235
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NowInWI
"Chicago and it's suburbs have been home to some of the fastest growing areas of the country", according to cencus data released 3/19/09. "Chicago had the seventh largest population increase in the country." Chicago-Area Population Grows: New Census Data
|
Stranegely they did not post any numbers for Chicago proper....
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Oak Park, IL
4,498 posts, read 6,118,634 times
Reputation: 2345
|
|
|
Population change of large, established pre-automobile cities since 1950 census :
NYC +5%
Chicago -20%
Boston -25%
Phlly -25%
DC -25%
Baltimore -33%
Cincinnati -33%
Pittsburgh -50%
Detroit -50%
Cleveland -50%
St. Louis -60%
All of these cities (except NYC, of course) hit their peak population at the time of the 1950 census. Suburbanization since then has led to near uniform population losses of these cities. Some of these cities have recently seen a reversal of their population loss, while others continue to plummet.
Last edited by oakparkdude; 04-11-2009 at 10:44 PM..
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,627 posts, read 1,598,687 times
Reputation: 235
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo
Population change of large, established pre-automobile cities since 1950 census :
NYC +5%
Chicago -20%
Boston -25%
Phlly -25%
DC -25%
Baltimore -33%
Detroit -50%
Cleveland -50%
St. Louis -60%
|
It's hard to believe that New York can still grow. I have not seen those number before but I remember seeing a table where Chicago was still losing population in the past 10 years while most cities with exception of Philiy and possibly Boston was gaining...
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:36 PM
|
|
|
|
1,459 posts, read 1,359,683 times
Reputation: 961
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dementor
Stranegely they did not post any numbers for Chicago proper....
|
Strange or not, it says Chicago and it's suburbs are home to some of the largest and fastest-growing areas of the country.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Similar Threads
-
Detroit vs. Chicago, City vs. City, 59 replies
-
Chicago Vs. Detroit, City vs. City, 35 replies
-
Detroit vs Chicago, City vs. City, 137 replies
-
detroit vs chicago in fashion, City vs. City, 113 replies
-
Detroit vs Chicago, Architecture-wise, City vs. City, 43 replies
-
Is Chicago becoming just a large Detroit or Cleveland?, City vs. City, 30 replies
|