Houston's Mainplace Tower vs Dallas' Museum Tower (skyscrapers, downtown, skyline)

[sxrckr]

Originally Posted by brandonlee206

They are both ugly IMO

Originally Posted by LovinDecatur

If they were going up in NYC, Chicago, or your city you'd be falling all over yourself to tell the world how beautiful they are.

Or Seattle, LOL!

[CTownNative]

I pick the Mainplace Tower. It has a cool design to it.

[Hendu]

Mainplace looks sleek and interesting, while Museum Tower looks like 'stock modern condo tower building photo #1247.'

[Akhenaton06]

I really dig MainPlace. Museum Tower, not so much.

[kdogg817]

I think Musuem tower looks better of the two.

[UTHORNS96]

Originally Posted by NYC1DAY

the buildings are 600 ft. that is nothing to brag aobut

So according to your criteria for what makes buildings beautiful Houston would have the third best skyline in the United States? It is the third tallest after all.

[Brewzerr68]

Originally Posted by NYC1DAY

the buildings are 600 ft. that is nothing to brag aobut

So, buildings are like penises then? Bragging rights go to the most well-hung?

I think a building's character and architectural worth should be based around uniqueness and not height. With that in mind, I'd have to agree that both of these buildings look like lighters. Houston's finest architectural moment was in 1927 with the Esperson building, which is FAR from the tallest.

[Brewzerr68]

Originally Posted by sxrckr

Or Seattle, LOL!

Seattle?

[alamode]

Hands down the Museum tower. It'll be located within the art district. It'll be very beautiful and will compliment the Dallas's skyline well.

[ParkLane2]

Mainplace? What a cheap name. Mainplace? !!!!!