U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 05-03-2009, 07:34 PM
 
5 posts, read 22,396 times
Reputation: 21

Advertisements

Both are great and underrated 2nd tier skylines. Which one do you like better?

San Francisco:


Philadelphia:

 
Old 05-03-2009, 07:47 PM
 
55 posts, read 180,576 times
Reputation: 47
Those photos make for a bad comparison because they are from such different angles.

Overall, SF has more 'large buildings' (and, yes, a greater 'large building density') but only a few supertalls. So Id say its a draw
 
Old 05-03-2009, 11:35 PM
 
Location: Villanova Pa.
4,887 posts, read 12,190,289 times
Reputation: 2574
I have SF #3 in the usa followed by Philadelphia in usa skyline rankings.

I'm not saying Philadelphia doesnt have a formidable skyline but what I am saying is that SF's overall package is too impressive for any other skyline other than Manhattan and Chicago.

Philadelphia









San Francisco






 
Old 05-04-2009, 05:04 AM
 
2,057 posts, read 4,743,950 times
Reputation: 977
SF has a better skyline than Philly

But, I would rathern live in Philly over SF
 
Old 05-04-2009, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia,New Jersey, NYC!
6,967 posts, read 17,750,912 times
Reputation: 2616
SF has more density and a cool backdrop, but i like the Philly talls. if only we get around to building the ACC. man, that would be sweet!


Last edited by john_starks; 05-04-2009 at 07:52 AM..
 
Old 05-04-2009, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,628 posts, read 12,112,091 times
Reputation: 4051
This is an awesome comparison! They're pretty neck and neck. For the natural backdrop, San Francisco...but for the actual skyline, I like Philly just because it has the picture perfect, "Tallest buildings in the direct-center" skyline, which I love. I have 1. Manhattan 2. Chi 3. Philly and a very close 4. SF for the best skylines in the country.
 
Old 05-04-2009, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Villanova Pa.
4,887 posts, read 12,190,289 times
Reputation: 2574
Philadelphia has done a nice job over the past 20 years with their skyline. Up until then they had a building height limit of 517'(tip of William Penns statue). Since they allowed the taller skyscrapers downtown (1989) Philadlephia has seen a renaissance and helped stop businesses fleeing to the suburbs.



 
Old 05-04-2009, 05:30 PM
 
1,031 posts, read 2,307,472 times
Reputation: 820
Both are equal IMO. Though SF is more dense.
 
Old 05-04-2009, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
6,268 posts, read 15,501,681 times
Reputation: 5159
Philadelphia got a late start in the skyscraper game after the "Gentlemens' Agreement" was breached in the '80s. They're certainly making up for lost time down there. I'm a bit of a skeptic re: ACC, but it would be REALLY awesome if it were to happen.
 
Old 05-04-2009, 07:14 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,391 posts, read 23,761,585 times
Reputation: 5608
isn't sf set to have a ton of new high rises?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top