Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is the second most important in the nation?
LA 211 35.34%
Chicago 171 28.64%
DC 81 13.57%
SF 39 6.53%
Boston 62 10.39%
Houston 33 5.53%
Voters: 597. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,449,301 times
Reputation: 4201

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
I see nothing in your statements that makes a point for Boston being better in medical than Houston. Equal maybe but not better.
And none of the Houston forumers have said anything to show you're more important in the healthcare field. I've heard "we're tops in medicine" and "ever heard of the Texas Medical Center?", but no facts. Meanwhile, we've been showing facts why we're better by showing we're #1 in NIH funding, and we've got two of the Top 10 hospitals in the country. To top that off, if you look at the categories for top hospitals, Boston is in the Top 10 of 15/16 categories, and in the Top 5 for 13/16 categories. Often there are multiple hospitals in the top 10 and sometimes eveen the top 5. Houston was also impressive, just not as impressive as Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,512 posts, read 33,510,933 times
Reputation: 12147
I think there is some confusion on comparing the health fields in Houston and Boston. The Texas Medical Center is not a hospital. It is a collection of multi-billion dollar research facilities. I didn't know that about Boston so Boston is no slouch in that category. But the TMC isn't a hospital. You can still get care there though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,512 posts, read 33,510,933 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael84 View Post
How are we even debating over Houston and Boston and which is more important? Boston is far more important. We get most of our oil from Canada anyway.
Which city in the US handles most of the countries oil? Which city in the US is most of the oil businesses located? Whether they are world headquarters or regional headquarters, the presence of energy and oil is there.

That said, I agree mattncind. You can't just disregard education and Boston simply destroys every city except maybe San Francisco in this category. If education wasn't that important, than the city of Houston wouldn't try to get the University of Houston into tier one status.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:40 PM
 
2,757 posts, read 5,641,430 times
Reputation: 1125
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
I agree with DC being #2....but how in god's name can you put Los Angeles behind Chicago, Boston, SF, and Houston? Hell I'm a Boston guy, and I have no shame in admitting we're not as important as LA, and I don't think any of those other cities will claim they're more important they're either.

I feel the only city that could claim the #2 spot instead of LA would be DC just because of the obvious political influence.

Would you care to explain your reasoning?

Mine would go:
DC > LA > Chicago/San Fran > Boston > Houston.
OKay, I will give a two part answer to you. 1)What comes to a persons mind when they hear these cities? Power and Government comes to my mind when I think of D.C., very high education for Boston, NASA and oil for Houston, innovative technology for San Fran/Bay Area, Chicago's just a large busy city, Hollywood for LA.

Here's part 2) Say you have a very young and impressionable young kid who wants to let his/her cities best attribute mold them for the future. I know that this is too simple but lets just do the perfect world act, the D.C. person would grow up being used the political game and could end up being someone important, the Boston kid could become some scholar who's knowledge will influence other generations down the road, the Bay Area kid could invent some new super-computer, the kid from LA could have a future in entertainment, I haven't came up with anything for the Chicago person but I'd still put it before L.A.

My reason are not perfect but I'm coming at a more "What's more beneficial?" angle. My reasons for picking Boston over L.A. is that I feel that the schools of Boston carries more weight than Hollywood (for the Billion dollar question, I'd trust the MIT guy over the Tom Cruise). That's my outlook on this anyway; this has been done before and I wanted new answers for this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,449,301 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
scratch education,it's important, but it dosen't benefit the rest of the country. Houston has Aerospace, Energy, Healthcare, Ports, Oil, and even Technology. Sorry, but what your saying isn't anything spectacular outside of the 4th highest GDP. I truely feel Houston beats Boston.

NYC: Finance
LA: Exports
CHI: Transportation
HOU:Energy/Oil
SF: Technolgy
DC: Government

Like you stated, Boston takes a backseat to the bay area when it comes to technology. The cities I listed above are first at what they do.
Scratch education? I already listed reasons how our educational institutions have affected this country in many ways. I guess educating several Presidents of the United States and other countries, US Senators, Congressmen and Supreme Court Justices isn't imporant!

Sure I guess we take a backseat to Silicon Valley in tech, but it's better than Houston. Biotech is very important in improving healthcare in this country, and we're one of the best at it, if not the best.

Boston is home to the world leader in mutual funds (Fidelity) and money management (State Street Bank). How is that not important?

If these things aren't spectucalar, then what's so spectacular about Houston's ports and aerospace?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,924,903 times
Reputation: 1819
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
And none of the Houston forumers have said anything to show you're more important in the healthcare field. I've heard "we're tops in medicine" and "ever heard of the Texas Medical Center?", but no facts. Meanwhile, we've been showing facts why we're better by showing we're #1 in NIH funding, and we've got two of the Top 10 hospitals in the country. To top that off, if you look at the categories for top hospitals, Boston is in the Top 10 of 15/16 categories, and in the Top 5 for 13/16 categories. Often there are multiple hospitals in the top 10 and sometimes eveen the top 5. Houston was also impressive, just not as impressive as Boston.

They thought their hospitals were better than NY's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,192,720 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Scratch education? I already listed reasons how our educational institutions have affected this country in many ways. I guess educating several Presidents of the United States and other countries, US Senators, Congressmen and Supreme Court Justices isn't imporant!

Sure I guess we take a backseat to Silicon Valley in tech, but it's better than Houston. Biotech is very important in improving healthcare in this country, and we're one of the best at it, if not the best.

Boston is home to the world leader in mutual funds (Fidelity) and money management (State Street Bank). How is that not important?

If these things aren't spectucalar, then what's so spectacular about Houston's ports and aerospace?
Yes because the US economy would definitely be in danger if something was to happen to those universities.

Education is important, but you can't compare that with things like oil, energy, finance,etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 07:03 PM
 
269 posts, read 468,778 times
Reputation: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael84 View Post
They thought their hospitals were better than NY's
What, you think NY's hospitals are vastly better than Houston's? I beg to differ.

And, Houston doesn't matter in energy because we "get most of our oil from Canada?" The over 5,000 energy, pipeline, exploration and production firms in the city don't really matter? Who do you think finds this oil in Canada, Alaska, and offshore? Could it be the hundreds of thousands of downstream engineers/geophysicists/etc that are employed by these companies? I could go on to prove you wrong, but that would be mean..this is way above your level.

You just come into threads and drop piles of steaming crap that have nothing to do with the topic. Now, run along and take some more self portraits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Houston Texas
2,915 posts, read 3,514,305 times
Reputation: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael84 View Post
They thought their hospitals were better than NY's
Are you still jealous of that poll on CD where Houston (and Boston) blew away NYC as far as what city people thought had the best healthcare??

Boston and Houston are both on the same level, sorry that it bothers you so much
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,924,903 times
Reputation: 1819
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetclimber View Post
Are you still jealous of that poll on CD where Houston (and Boston) blew away NYC as far as what city people thought had the best healthcare??

Boston and Houston are both on the same level, sorry that it bothers you so much

Take a look at that list that previous poster posted of the top hospitals in the country. More in NY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top