Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think NYC will still be the largest city in 2050?
Yes 628 81.56%
No 142 18.44%
Voters: 770. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-18-2009, 09:35 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,075,287 times
Reputation: 126

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
Well that is why I said 3.8-4.2 not the 3.2 the numbers said. The fringes of Chicago and the inner suburbs are not outragously dense.
I proved you otherwise...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2009, 10:15 PM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,373,667 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
I proved you otherwise...
Yeah, oak park, berwyn, cicero are fairly dense, Cook County is a big place though. The original point still stands, that a 600 sq ft Chicago would have somewhere around 4 million people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 01:17 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,956,698 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradly View Post
Top 10 List

1. New York City
2. Los Angeles
3. Houston
4. Phoenix
5. San Antonio
6. Chicago
7. Philadelphia
8. Dallas
9. San Diego
10. Fort Worth or Jacksonville (Toss Up)

My City Albuquerque, 2050 Rank: 17, Currently 34. 7th fastest growing large city.
Metro Rank: 31

Rio Rancho New Mexico 2050 Projection Rank: 52, Currently not ranked but listed as 275.
Soon to be Albuquerque-Rio Rancho Metro.

I put Fort Worth because of how fast it has been growing, It is the third fastest growing "large city" in america.

534,694 in 2000
720,250 in 2008

That is 185,556+ people added in just eight years.

I say in 2010; 767,000+
In 2015; 890,000+
In 2020; 1,011,000+
In 2030; 1,300,000+
In 2040; 1,600,000+
In 2050; 1,800,000+

Studies and Research is still going on.. but some fast growth is coming for Fort Worth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 01:13 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,075,287 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradly View Post
I put Fort Worth because of how fast it has been growing, It is the third fastest growing "large city" in america.

534,694 in 2000
720,250 in 2008

That is 185,556+ people added in just eight years.

I say in 2010; 767,000+
In 2015; 890,000+
In 2020; 1,011,000+
In 2030; 1,300,000+
In 2040; 1,600,000+
In 2050; 1,800,000+

Studies and Research is still going on.. but some fast growth is coming for Fort Worth.
I don't think that the city will continue to add over 200,000+ people for that long. The growth between 2010 and 2020 is going to slow A LOT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 11:23 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,956,698 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
I don't think that the city will continue to add over 200,000+ people for that long. The growth between 2010 and 2020 is going to slow A LOT.
Sooo.. I'm assuming you went to school for 6 years in Urban and Suburban planning and has done studies for 5 years on america's top 40 cities, and sits on the city's planning board. Probably not, studies show that Fort Worth will grow faster and faster, it wont slow at all.

When you are as close to knowing more about cities and their growth like me.. then comment back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 11:30 PM
 
Location: Utopia
1,999 posts, read 10,528,513 times
Reputation: 1529
5 years ago it was on Chicago tv over and over that in 10 years Houston's population will surpass Chicago. 5 years to go right now, and we'll see. Looks like it's going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 03:50 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,075,287 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradly View Post
Sooo.. I'm assuming you went to school for 6 years in Urban and Suburban planning and has done studies for 5 years on america's top 40 cities, and sits on the city's planning board. Probably not, studies show that Fort Worth will grow faster and faster, it wont slow at all.

When you are as close to knowing more about cities and their growth like me.. then comment back.
You're going to tell me, that with immigration slowing to the U.S within the next 50 years, Fort Worth will continue to add not only 100,000, not 200,000, but 300,000+ a decade for the next 40 years? Do you realize how irrational that sounds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 03:52 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,075,287 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by TootsieWootsie View Post
5 years ago it was on Chicago tv over and over that in 10 years Houston's population will surpass Chicago. 5 years to go right now, and we'll see. Looks like it's going to happen.
Not in 5 years. As of now, Houston has to gain AT LEAST another 500,000 people (assuming Chicago continues to decline in population). I don't see it happening by 2015 even. 2020 is more realistic but not probable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 06:34 PM
 
Location: C.R. K-T
6,202 posts, read 11,379,012 times
Reputation: 3804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
Not in 5 years. As of now, Houston has to gain AT LEAST another 500,000 people (assuming Chicago continues to decline in population). I don't see it happening by 2015 even. 2020 is more realistic but not probable.
I noticed many TEXANS are moving from Dallas and San Antonio. (Probably to run away from those California speculator-"investors.") If Greater Houston--6 million--and the Dallas side of DFW (Dallas and Collin Counties)--3.5 million--were put together, it would equal Chicagoland. All Houston has to do is to figure out how to get the 3.5 million here. (Surprisingly they're coming on their own although ever so slowly.) For city limits purposes, Houston has to annex the rest of Alief, the Katy Suburbs, and Cy-Fair to reach Chicago city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 08:06 PM
 
765 posts, read 1,851,867 times
Reputation: 504
I think the numbers for Chicago city limit population will be a surprise once the 2010 census is released. Even population estimates say that Chicago has been losing population slightly...no one even agrees especially with all the housing units being constructed in the city. It might really increase to more than 2,900,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top