U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Funky Town, Texas
3,375 posts, read 3,064,694 times
Reputation: 1201
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWong View Post
Well, just bc a place has alot of billionaires and good economy doesn't mean it's all that great. It's great if money is your driving force.

Another reason why billionaires set up shop in DFW is bc TAXES. In NY or CA state taxes knock out 10%. Ask a billionaire if he'd mind if they took 10% out of his income if he'd stay.

People move to DFW bc it's cheap and there are jobs. Take that away.... it would be just farmland. Heck, Texas most popular and "cool" is Austin which is about 1/5 of the size of DFW.... what's going on with that?

Weather - avg, typical southern city.

Attractions - other than the cowboys, nothing worth noting and lately Cowboys havn't been anything worth mentioning in 15 years.

A work first mentality that in other cities - doesn't really fly well.

Suburbs galore.

High Crime.

Traffic that can rival just about any city.

I am lost. What exactly do you mean by a work first mentality? I would hope any american would work to earn a living. That has nothing to do with conservative views. No one should be living off goverment if they have the ability to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 10-05-2009, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,365 posts, read 1,280,298 times
Reputation: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
I have notice a trend on city-data that Dallas is not respected on city-data. I do understand that Dallas natives tend not to post on the national forum, but very well represented on the Texas forums. I am not sure exactly how a city that added more residents than any United States city in 2007 could be disrespected.

Dallas-Fort Worth metro area has a population of over 6.5 million. It sits on the banks of the trinity river. It is the largest metro area in Texas, the south, and 4th largest in the country. There are over 600,000 more residents in DFW than Houston. Some estimates show the the metro upwards to closer to 7 million. So it is false that some kind of way Houston metro area is larger than Dallas.

Furthermore, what really bothers me is Americans don't know the importance of Dallas and its dominance in the region. Dallas is 8th in the world with 24 billionaires. Dallas also has more billionaires than any Texas city. Dallas has a very diverse economy primarily based on telecommunication, banking, commerce, energy, computer technology, and transportation.

These characteristics are why Dallas is known as Big D.






http://farm1.static.flickr.com/19/95...011ef110da.jpg

Dallas skyline image by sec8agent on Photobucket



This is a list of all the fortune 500 companies in the Dallas Region.

Exxon Mobil Corp. 2 Irving AMR Corp./American Airlines 109 Fort Worth Electronic Data Systems Corp.* 115 Plano J.C. Penney Company Inc. 126 Plano Kimberly-Clark Corp. 136 Irving Fluor Corp. 148 Irving Burlington Northern Santa Fe 160 Fort Worth Centex Corp. 177 Dallas Texas Instruments 185 Dallas Dean Foods Company 224 Dallas D.R. Horton 235 Fort Worth Southwest Airlines 267 Dallas Tenet Healthcare Corp. 280 Dallas Commercial Metals Co. 303 Irving Energy Future Holdings 317 Dallas GameStop 348 Grapevine Energy Transfer Equity 361 Dallas Celanese 367 Dallas Atmos Energy 416 Dallas Affiliated Computer Services 423 Dallas Blockbuster Inc. 434 Dallas XTO Energy 436 Fort Worth Holly 484 Dallas
Good post, but as I have pointed out before, Dallas does not have the largest metro it is ONE HALF of DFW which is anchored by two major cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 10:21 AM
 
Location: The land of sugar... previously Houston and Austin
4,886 posts, read 6,685,947 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajf131 View Post
At any rate, I could've sworn Houston was the largest metro in the South. Dallas I thought was 2nd with Atlanta and Miami close behind.
Lots of confusion with this.
Houston is the largest city.
But Dallas-Fort Worth is the largest metro. There are two major cities in that metro.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWong View Post
People move to DFW bc it's cheap and there are jobs. Take that away.... it would be just farmland. Heck, Texas most popular and "cool" is Austin which is about 1/5 of the size of DFW.... what's going on with that?
"Cool" is subjective, and do you just believe anything the magazines say? Austin is a college town, and so it has that youth factor. Aside from that it's overrated, and I can say this from real experience. Do you think Lake Travis is natural? (and right now it's all dried up.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,365 posts, read 1,280,298 times
Reputation: 480
Yeah. Austin is certainly a nice city with a neat downtown, but for the most part it is definitely overrated. It might be the "coolest" for the corny hipster types, but Houston and Dallas (along with Fort Worth) are the TRUE cool cities in Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Dallas
87 posts, read 90,527 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
Since when is Dallas part of "the south?"
Right...it's classified as southwest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Funky Town, Texas
3,375 posts, read 3,064,694 times
Reputation: 1201
Quote:
Originally Posted by hype View Post
Right...it's classified as southwest.
Dallas is southern its not part of the southwest. What characteristics of Dallas is anything like Phoenix, AZ. The Demographics and climate are nothing alike. This has already been discuss numerous times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
3,548 posts, read 3,691,828 times
Reputation: 1230
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Dallas is southern its not part of the southwest. What characteristics of Dallas is anything like Phoenix, AZ. The Demographics and climate are nothing alike. This has already been discuss numerous times.
i admittedly don't know much about the city, but i've always pictured Dallas as more "southwest" than "south". When I think of south, I think of Atlanta, Charlotte, Birmingham, Tampa, Memphis, etc. Dallas doesn't really seem to fit with those. But, again, I don't know it very well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,365 posts, read 1,280,298 times
Reputation: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14thandYou View Post
i admittedly don't know much about the city, but i've always pictured Dallas as more "southwest" than "south". When I think of south, I think of Atlanta, Charlotte, Birmingham, Tampa, Memphis, etc. Dallas doesn't really seem to fit with those. But, again, I don't know it very well.
Well you admitted it yourself. You don't know Dallas very well, but it is definitely the South.

Many people get the idea that Texas is mostly Southwestern because of the way the media exaggerates and often inaccurately portrays Texas as such. Even some Texans themselves have helped perpetuate some of these stereotypes by not knowing the roots of their own state's culture.

Then there's always the excuse of HOU and DAL having a lot of Latinos. So what, we drive all the Mexicans out of the cities and then voila we're the South again? No. It doesn't work like that. Dallas is rooted in the South, and no amount of outside cultures can change that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 01:12 PM
 
15,372 posts, read 20,364,159 times
Reputation: 5299
Austin - everybody loves it because it's our capital but it's overrated in the media. Dallas and Houston have some great inner-city neighborhoods which are more "Austin" than Austin. Plus you have 'ancillary' attractions that a metro of 6.5 million demands.

In Dallas check out East Dallas, North Oak Cliff/Fort Worth Avenue and Cedars/Southside on Lamar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-05-2009, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC
638 posts, read 376,113 times
Reputation: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Your analysis is correct. No Metro has gained on Dallas and actually the gap has been rising between Dallas and everyone else. Dallas has been gaining on Chicago for quite some time now. Probably in the next 15 -20 years if Dallas growth continues it will challenge Chicago for third most populated metro.

Your counting on the addition of 3 million souls (to challenge Chicago) to the Dallas metro area over a period of 20 years? LMAO!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top