Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Despite Shortsightedness of Civil Leaders in recent decades, St. Louis has a nice collection of historic housing. Not sure if it's the best of the choices, though.
Despite Shortsightedness of Civil Leaders in recent decades, St. Louis has a nice collection of historic housing. Not sure if it's the best of the choices, though.
How much of the historical architecture in the City has been intentionally demolished? I'm not counting abandoned places that are still standing.
For ex: STL in 1930 ... what % of that is still standing?
It was one of the largest U.S. cities at the time, so it must have had a huge collection on very interesting acrhitecture.
What city leaders would do such a thing? It's almost like cutting your own arm off.
Probably Detroit since it became so populous and prosperous. It may not have a long of a history as some of the others, but its boom years meant a lot of construction from the late 19th to early 20th century.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.