U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: I would rather live in the...
Rust Belt 181 45.14%
Sun Belt 220 54.86%
Voters: 401. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 07-04-2009, 11:42 AM
 
157 posts, read 349,597 times
Reputation: 186

Advertisements

It seems that there is a lot of discussion here about regional preferences, but I couldn't find this poll. Not "North vs. South", but more specifically, Rust Belt (i.e. Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania) versus Sun Belt (i.e., California, Arizona, Nevada, Florida.) Some "northern" states aren't in the Rust Belt (i.e., Vermont) just as some Southern states (i.e., Kentucky or West Virginia) aren't in the Sun Belt.

Which of those two broad regions do you prefer, and why?

Having lived in both...my vote is with the Sun Belt. Rust Belt cities and states had absolutely no appeal to me at all, and I was never happy living in that region.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:32 PM
 
1,247 posts, read 3,478,146 times
Reputation: 556
Cool poll idea, but the rust belt is going to get butchered, even though I voted for it.

People go crazy when they have to get the snowblower out but yet they don't mind 105 degrees with 99.999999999999999999% humidity?

I don't get it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:47 PM
 
Location: The Queen City
174 posts, read 359,637 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daytonnatian View Post
Cool poll idea, but the rust belt is going to get butchered, even though I voted for it.

People go crazy when they have to get the snowblower out but yet they don't mind 105 degrees with 99.999999999999999999% humidity?

I don't get it.
I didn't either..... until I made the move.

Sunbelt.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
18,833 posts, read 27,714,275 times
Reputation: 9896
That's because there is probably never a day where it's 105 degrees with 99.9% humidity. It's basically taking the bad with the good when it comes to weather. In the North, many people do not like being cold whatsoever. When the summer comes in teh North, they can be just as humid as it's Southern peers. Meanwhile in the South, the summers can be brutal. But the winters are very very pleasent.

There are only a few Northern cities I would live in and those are Minneapolis, Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, and Washington DC if you want to count that. Weather is not a big deal to me.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Just Outside of Chicagoland
77 posts, read 245,445 times
Reputation: 56
i would have to go with rust belt, i just cant stand crazy heat all year.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:52 PM
 
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,116 posts, read 4,277,958 times
Reputation: 1114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
But the winters are very very pleasent.
winters without snow are not "very very pleasent".

in fact, they suck.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:54 PM
 
157 posts, read 349,597 times
Reputation: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWereRabbit View Post
winters without snow are not "very very pleasent".

in fact, they suck.
South Florida winters are 76 degree days, 60 degree nights, not a cloud in the sky and sunny.

I'll take that over some dreary, snowed-in, 20-degree Michigan winter day without any hesitation!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
4,968 posts, read 7,834,093 times
Reputation: 4678
I choose the rust belt for a few reasons.

- I prefer the weather.
- I prefer the architecture.
- I like the grit and history. (I know many sunbelt cities have history, but all of the new growth makes the old stuff harder to see.)

I've never been a follower of trends. And, the trend around here seems to be to move to the sunbelt. I don't consider this a legitimate reason, but it affects my decision anyway.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,005 posts, read 2,484,918 times
Reputation: 246
If sun belt include west coast, then ofcourse the sun belt.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:38 PM
 
2,758 posts, read 4,990,651 times
Reputation: 1115
I'd take the Sunbelt easily: Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Syracuse, Milwaukee, Detroit, Toledo, Cleveland, etc against ATL, Miami, LA, New Orleans, Houston, San Diego...Keep going?OK, vs Dallas, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tampa, Orlando,OKC, and San Antonio. I can live in Pittsburgh and Milwaukee easily, but forget the rest of the rustbelt towns. The Sunbelt has more to offer.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top