Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Suburban Metro Detroit or Suburban Minneapolis/St. Paul?
Suburban Detroit 59 55.66%
Suburban Minneapolis/St. Paul 47 44.34%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009, 01:51 AM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoarfrost View Post
If I've been to the Midwest? Had I not, I'd have to rewrite several laws of physics considering that I'm sitting here at ground zero of the wasteland that is Southeast Michigan.

I don't quite think I've ever said that I hate Cleveland. I'd hate to live in Cleveland, but at present I couldn't be more apathetic towards it.

At any rate, I've lived all over Metro Detroit. Vapid, old money types in Oakland, decrepit blue collar in the west and downriver, archetypal suburbs everywhere else. Royal Oak and Ferndale are the only ones who even try to be somewhat cool and unique.

You have to have endured the displeasure of living here to understand how regressive and utterly dysfunctional Metro Detroit is.
What about Birmingham? Birmingham has got to be one of the coolest suburbs in America.

If you've said anything negative about Cleveland, you just buy into the stereotypes. Cleveland has got some awesome suburbs as well. Its economy has just struggled lately, mainly due to union issues, just like southeast Michigan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2009, 02:06 AM
 
3,282 posts, read 5,201,780 times
Reputation: 1935
Quote:
Originally Posted by US-Traveller View Post
What about Birmingham? Birmingham has got to be one of the coolest suburbs in America.

If you've said anything negative about Cleveland, you just buy into the stereotypes. Cleveland has got some awesome suburbs as well. Its economy has just struggled lately, mainly due to union issues, just like southeast Michigan.
I'll say this, Detroit's suburbs are good relative to most suburbs. I'm not saying they are worse. They're just that, suburbs. There's a limit to how interesting they can be.

But then again, I personally don't see much appeal to living in a nice suburb if the arteries of the metro area lead to a dead heart. Suburbs feed off of a city. The haphazard decentralization of metro Detroit kills it as a viable urban area. We can't even get people to sit down and get along long enough to build a WalMart or a train system. And I don't even want a WalMart. It's just emblematic of the total breakdown of this metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 02:13 AM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoarfrost View Post
I'll say this, Detroit's suburbs are good relative to most suburbs. I'm not saying they are worse. They're just that, suburbs. There's a limit to how interesting they can be.

But then again, I personally don't see much appeal to living in a nice suburb if the arteries of the metro area lead to a dead heart. Suburbs feed off of a city. The haphazard decentralization of metro Detroit kills it as a viable urban area. We can't even get people to sit down and get along long enough to build a WalMart or a train system. And I don't even want a WalMart. It's just emblematic of the total breakdown of this metro.
Just because a city is decentralized doesn't mean it cannot be sucessful and it doesn't mean that it cannot have nice urban and suburban areas. Sucessful cities like Los Angeles are decentralized, as are San Francisco and Seattle on some level.

Politics in Michigan are bad, but that is off topic for comparing suburban Minneapolis and suburban Detroit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 02:37 AM
 
3,282 posts, read 5,201,780 times
Reputation: 1935
Quote:
Originally Posted by US-Traveller View Post
Just because a city is decentralized doesn't mean it cannot be sucessful and it doesn't mean that it cannot have nice urban and suburban areas. Sucessful cities like Los Angeles are decentralized, as are San Francisco and Seattle on some level.

Politics in Michigan are bad, but that is off topic for comparing suburban Minneapolis and suburban Detroit.
LA, SF, and Seattle are the powerhouses and the name brands of their metros though. Metro Detroit has none. Without a major urban flagship, there is no draw.

The politics are a huge part of the reason Detroit and Michigan have no future as it is right now. Who wants to put up with municipal childishness and stagnation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoarfrost View Post
LA, SF, and Seattle are the powerhouses and the name brands of their metros though. Metro Detroit has none. Without a major urban flagship, there is no draw.

The politics are a huge part of the reason Detroit and Michigan have no future as it is right now. Who wants to put up with municipal childishness and stagnation?
I think Detroit is more iconic than San Francisco and Seattle. Detroit is known worldwide as the "Automotive Capital of the World." Maybe the automotive industry and Michigan's economy in general isn't doing well but Detroit is one of America's most important cities and most recognizable. If Detroit was so bad and so insignificant its airport wouldn't be able to handle all of the international destinations it has and it wouldn't be able to call itself the place of the North American Auto Show. Detroit has issues just as any other city, but you need to look at the positive and expand on that and try to fix whats wrong instead of degrading the place repeatedly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605
Looks like Suburban Detroit is winning?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 04:50 PM
 
3,282 posts, read 5,201,780 times
Reputation: 1935
Quote:
Originally Posted by US-Traveller View Post
I think Detroit is more iconic than San Francisco and Seattle. Detroit is known worldwide as the "Automotive Capital of the World." Maybe the automotive industry and Michigan's economy in general isn't doing well but Detroit is one of America's most important cities and most recognizable. If Detroit was so bad and so insignificant its airport wouldn't be able to handle all of the international destinations it has and it wouldn't be able to call itself the place of the North American Auto Show. Detroit has issues just as any other city, but you need to look at the positive and expand on that and try to fix whats wrong instead of degrading the place repeatedly.
If you don't understand where I'm coming from, clearly you haven't ever lived here and interacted with the people the way I have.

The people in the city couldn't care less and, even if they did, aren't smart enough to do anything about it. If you need evidence of this, I'm sure you recall our now infamous ex-mayor who was twice reelected. Everyone with any kind of drive and education either has left or is on the way out. And the people outside the city dislike the people inside the city so much that they'd never have anything to do with it.

As I said, dysfunctional dynamics ensure that minus a game changer, the city and the state will continue to stagnate for the foreseeable future. Picturesque suburbs? Sure. But picturesque suburbs with no future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoarfrost View Post
If you don't understand where I'm coming from, clearly you haven't ever lived here and interacted with the people the way I have.

The people in the city couldn't care less and, even if they did, aren't smart enough to do anything about it. If you need evidence of this, I'm sure you recall our now infamous ex-mayor who was twice reelected. Everyone with any kind of drive and education either has left or is on the way out. And the people outside the city dislike the people inside the city so much that they'd never have anything to do with it.

As I said, dysfunctional dynamics ensure that minus a game changer, the city and the state will continue to stagnate for the foreseeable future. Picturesque suburbs? Sure. But picturesque suburbs with no future.
I lived in Oakland County for a short time in 2007-2008. I agree that the politics of Michigan and especially Wayne County are very disfunctional. I hope I don't get heat for this, but the problem is that Wayne County has too many African-Americans, whom are poor, uneducated, and vote in blocks of 98/100 for Democratic candidates that mess up the area.

I think that Oakland County itself has a bright future, unless it continues its trend of becoming more pro-union and Democratic. The car companies and other high-tech corporations have large investments in the area. Oakland County also boasts top educational institutions and some of the wealthiest enclaves in America.

Michigan will turn around. It'll take some time, but it will happen, sooner if the politics get in order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 05:34 PM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,090,617 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by US-Traveller View Post
Looks like Suburban Detroit is winning?
Good. Glad to see the posters are giving this some thought. I expected that a lot of the votes would be a knee-jerk reaction to what they hear about Detroit overall, but the reality is that some of the Detroit suburbs that the OP cites are the loveliest in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Winnetka, IL & Rolling Hills, CA
1,273 posts, read 4,419,303 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinDecatur View Post
Good. Glad to see the posters are giving this some thought. I expected that a lot of the votes would be a knee-jerk reaction to what they hear about Detroit overall, but the reality is that some of the Detroit suburbs that the OP cites are the loveliest in America.
I also thought that people would be too rapped up in the City of Detroit's poor reputation.

I am glad to see that those who know the area are the ones who are voting instead of those who just dislike Michigan without having experienced what it has to offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top