Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
now if yall look at the pictures that polo89 just posted, you would see what a real skyline is supposed to look like...Houston doesnt just have 1 skyline but 3,or maybe more than 3...and to me Houston looks more urbanized with all the buildings scattered in different places...so my vote goes to H-town,Texas. Montreal does have a nice skyline, but to me, its not better than Houstons.
now if yall look at the pictures that polo89 just posted, you would see what a real skyline is supposed to look like...Houston doesnt just have 1 skyline but 3,or maybe more than 3...and to me Houston looks more urbanized with all the buildings scattered in different places...so my vote goes to H-town,Texas. Montreal does have a nice skyline, but to me, its not better than Houstons.
Montreal is a more fluid city where the dense downtown melts into the University district and the surrounding city.
Houston always frustrated me because the downtown wasn't very dense, although there were a lot of tall buildings in the core - but the kicker was the damn interstates that completely cut off downtown from the surrounding areas. I HATE it when cities do things like that.
Montreal is a more fluid city where the dense downtown melts into the University district and the surrounding city.
Houston always frustrated me because the downtown wasn't very dense, although there were a lot of tall buildings in the core - but the kicker was the damn interstates that completely cut off downtown from the surrounding areas. I HATE it when cities do things like that.
Don't you mean small? Houston's skyline is pretty dense.
Montreal is a more fluid city where the dense downtown melts into the University district and the surrounding city.
Houston always frustrated me because the downtown wasn't very dense, although there were a lot of tall buildings in the core - but the kicker was the damn interstates that completely cut off downtown from the surrounding areas. I HATE it when cities do things like that.
Montreal is also much older, longer established, and is very well planned. Main reason why it takes the cake and is more of a fluent city than Houston is.
Montreal is also much older, longer established, and is very well planned. Main reason why it takes the cake and is more of a fluent city than Houston is.
I wouldn't say it takes the cake, what Houston lacks in fluency, it makes up in girth, architecture, and quantity. And what Montreal HAS in fluency and density, it lacks in what Houston has.
i really like those pictures that were just posted of TMA....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
