|
08-27-2009, 01:08 AM
|
|
|
|
221 posts, read 501,730 times
Reputation: 163
|
|
|
1960's--San Francisco
1970's--???
1980's--LA
1990's--Seattle
2000--???
|
|
08-27-2009, 01:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: In the heights
11,554 posts, read 10,751,982 times
Reputation: 4993
|
|
|
70s would probably be New York with disco and punk, but it's hard to say any city was more influential for any decade since musical fads come and go so quickly
|
|
08-27-2009, 01:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Location Location
3,223 posts, read 6,145,757 times
Reputation: 1460
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erin3465
1970's--???
|
Detroit rather people like it or not |
|
08-27-2009, 01:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: In the heights
11,554 posts, read 10,751,982 times
Reputation: 4993
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noid_1985
Detroit rather people like it or not
|
If you're talking about Motown, most of its heydays were in the 60s while most of the 70s were spent in LA. |
|
08-27-2009, 01:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Spain
1,856 posts, read 2,910,901 times
Reputation: 898
|
|
|
It seems like New York and L.A. are the top two in every decade since at least the 70's. But beyond those 2 the rest look ok.
|
|
08-27-2009, 01:27 AM
|
|
|
|
221 posts, read 501,730 times
Reputation: 163
|
|
I disagree with that. Clearly SF in the 60's and Seattle in the 90's had more influence than either LA or New York.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX
It seems like New York and L.A. are the top two in every decade since at least the 70's. But beyond those 2 the rest look ok.
|
|
|
08-27-2009, 01:30 AM
|
|
|
|
13,424 posts, read 14,014,919 times
Reputation: 3515
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erin3465
I disagree with that. Clearly SF in the 60's and Seattle in the 90's had more influence than either LA or New York.
|
I agree. |
|
08-27-2009, 01:33 AM
|
|
|
|
13,424 posts, read 14,014,919 times
Reputation: 3515
|
|
|
60's SF
70's NYC
80's LA
90's SEA/LA(Gangsta Rap)
00's?
Last edited by polo89; 08-27-2009 at 01:46 AM..
|
|
08-27-2009, 01:35 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Spain
1,856 posts, read 2,910,901 times
Reputation: 898
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by erin3465
I disagree with that. Clearly SF in the 60's and Seattle in the 90's had more influence than either LA or New York.
|
I think people say Seattle because grunge was very popular and everyone knows that Seattle started that trend, but it's a stretch to say that Grunge bands "dominated" the sheer output of music from hubs NYC and L.A. Hell, even Orlando with all its ****ty teeny bop bands probably sold as well as grunge did. |
|
08-27-2009, 01:37 AM
|
|
|
|
221 posts, read 501,730 times
Reputation: 163
|
|
This is about popular music in general, not just hip-hop...or are you saying other genres of popular music (like Rock) became stale in the late 90's and early 2000s. Because I would agree with that, although saying ATL/No for 2000's is kind of a stretch.
Overall, 2000s was kind of a bad decade for music...
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89
60's SF
70's NYC
80's LA
90's SEA/LA(Gangsta Rap)
00's ATL/NO(Southern Rap)
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
