Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In terms of healthy living and value of life, hands down it is Minneapolis. Minneapolis is considerably better in terms of education, crime, cleanliness, job availibility, etc. The metro area of the Twin Cities is consistently rated as the healthiest, smartest, and most intellectual in the United States.
When it comes to weather, the two both offer extremes. Either really cold in the winter, or really hot in the summer.
I think they both lie on the same Parallel however.
I'm actually surprised that a Southern city is actually winning, both are magnificent places to live but it's good to see the South win something for once.
Houston because of the better climate, very modern, close to the Gulf of Mexico and a lot of cities such as New Orleans , Dallas, etc.
Yeah, Minneapolis isn't modern at all.
I'd rather be 6 hours from Chicago than 5 hours from New Orleans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico
I'm gonna go with Houston on this believe it or not... I couldn't deal with the weather in Minneapolis, plus its extremely landlocked... I need to be by some water..
When you state some water, are referring to an ocean basin? Seriously, last time I checked there is plenty of water within the Twin Cities area.
Houston probably wins out in shopping but who really cares?
BTW, what's the point in trying to compare these two (Minneapolis - 382,000; Houston 2.2 million)? Houston should be compared to the likes of Chicago. Oh wait a minute. That wouldn't work out so well.
Location: The land of sugar... previously Houston and Austin
5,429 posts, read 14,838,516 times
Reputation: 3672
Quote:
Originally Posted by knke0204
In terms of healthy living and value of life, hands down it is Minneapolis. Minneapolis is considerably better in terms of education, crime, cleanliness, job availibility, etc.
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,929,225 times
Reputation: 1819
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut
Yeah, Minneapolis isn't modern at all.
I'd rather be 6 hours from Chicago than 5 hours from New Orleans.
When you state some water, are referring to an ocean basin? Seriously, last time I checked there is plenty of water within the Twin Cities area.
Houston probably wins out in shopping but who really cares?
BTW, what's the point in trying to compare these two (Minneapolis - 382,000; Houston 2.2 million)? Houston should be compared to the likes of Chicago. Oh wait a minute. That wouldn't work out so well.
I'd rather be 6 hours from Chicago than 5 hours from New Orleans.
BTW, what's the point in trying to compare these two (Minneapolis - 382,000; Houston 2.2 million)? Houston should be compared to the likes of Chicago. Oh wait a minute. That wouldn't work out so well.
I never said Minneapolis wasn't modern.
Well let me be 5 hours from the beautiful city of New Orleans, if I wanted to live close to Chicago I'd live in the Chicago Metro.
I really like Chicago but what does it have that Houston doesn't, a Sears Tower?
Location: The land of sugar... previously Houston and Austin
5,429 posts, read 14,838,516 times
Reputation: 3672
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut
Yeah, Minneapolis isn't modern at all.
... BTW, what's the point in trying to compare these two (Minneapolis - 382,000; Houston 2.2 million)?
Touchy.
Isn't comparing cities what the city vs city forum is for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut
Houston should be compared to the likes of Chicago. Oh wait a minute. That wouldn't work out so well.
No need to be so rude.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.