Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Select all metros that you would describe as "big cities"
New York 552 83.89%
Los Angeles 526 79.94%
Chicago 538 81.76%
Dallas 396 60.18%
Philadelphia 480 72.95%
Houston 418 63.53%
Miami 383 58.21%
Atlanta 380 57.75%
Washington DC 430 65.35%
Boston 436 66.26%
Detroit 307 46.66%
Phoenix 246 37.39%
San Francisco 453 68.84%
Inland Empire, CA 34 5.17%
Seattle 342 51.98%
Minneapolis 249 37.84%
San Diego 214 32.52%
St. Louis 175 26.60%
Tampa 117 17.78%
Baltimore 213 32.37%
Denver 242 36.78%
Pittsburgh 170 25.84%
Portland 123 18.69%
Cincinnati 142 21.58%
Sacramento 91 13.83%
Cleveland 167 25.38%
Orlando 100 15.20%
San Antonio 128 19.45%
Kansas City 134 20.36%
Las Vegas 143 21.73%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 658. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2017, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,194,814 times
Reputation: 2637

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehkou View Post
I use the following:

>100,000 = Small City

100,000-500,000 = Medium City

500,000-1,000,000 = Big City

1,000,000+ = Monster City or Megapolis
1,000,000 Big.

Only a few cities get "Monster city" And that's probably L.A./NYC
You can't compare 1 million to 8 or 5 million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
707 posts, read 749,225 times
Reputation: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
1,000,000 Big.

Only a few cities get "Monster city" And that's probably L.A./NYC
You can't compare 1 million to 8 or 5 million
Perhaps I should split that category:

1m = Megapolis

5m+ = Monster city

I also factor size proportionate to population using western city average densities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2017, 06:16 PM
 
205 posts, read 249,267 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Are you describing your home town?
Jackson only has 539,057 people in the 5 counties of Copiah, Hinds, Madison, Rankin, and Simpson counties.

In the Combined Statistical Area, Jackson-Vicksburg Brookhaven (Warren, Lincoln, Hinds, Madison, Rankin, Yazoo, Copiah, and Simpson counties) it goes up to 650,764.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 12:59 PM
 
2,262 posts, read 2,396,074 times
Reputation: 2741
Quote:
Originally Posted by g500 View Post
The following cities are the only cities that are big time cities across the board to everyone - NYC and LA. I would fully expect most of the world's population to know about or have heard of these two cities.

That being said, the following cities are big time to nearly/virtually everyone, but not all depending on their background (maybe growing up and living all their life in NYC, London, Tokyo, Shanghai etc.): Chicago, Washington DC, San Francisco, Dallas, Boston, Miami, Houston, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Seattle, Phoenix, and Minneapolis. In that general order. In my opinion, these are still among the US's major global cities. I would expect a large percentage of people in the world to know or have heard of these cities too.

After that, it becomes more subjective based on user experiences, so I tend to think of those 14 cities as all-around big time cities, and I think the vast majority of people would really tend to agree. Now, are there more big cities, in my opinion? Absolutely! But convincing nearly everyone to agree on that becomes more and increasingly difficult.

In my personal opinion, the cut-off for a national big city is probably somewhere in the top 50 (1 million in urban area population), such as Richmond, VA. Also IMO, there can be a big city within a state that is most definitely not a big city nationally, such as Burlington, VT or Cheyenne, WY. Definitely small cities, but significant to their respective states.
Maybe it's because I'm from the east coast and the only cities people really talk about are DC, NYC, Chicago and Boston, etc but I don't really consider Minneapolis a big city... it's just... a city.

Anything over 500,000 or 600,000 people I consider big, anything under that, not really. When you think about it, 200K or 300K isn't really a lot of people. There are counties in NoVa or Maryland or NJ with over 1 million people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 01:12 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,846,043 times
Reputation: 8651
Around 3,000,000. Basically the top 15-20.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:03 PM
Status: "See My Blog Entries for my Top 500 Most Important USA Cities" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: Harrisburg, PA
1,051 posts, read 975,507 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOVA_guy View Post
Maybe it's because I'm from the east coast and the only cities people really talk about are DC, NYC, Chicago and Boston, etc but I don't really consider Minneapolis a big city... it's just... a city.

Anything over 500,000 or 600,000 people I consider big, anything under that, not really. When you think about it, 200K or 300K isn't really a lot of people. There are counties in NoVa or Maryland or NJ with over 1 million people.
Yeah you know, I was thinking that Pheonix, Seattle, and Minneapolis are questionable as being big time cities to virtually everyone. Just depends. I'd love to do a thread called "what are the most recognizable/esteemed U.S. cities among the world". My guess is that even the some of the most oblivious/remote people should still know about or have heard of NY/Manhattan/Brooklyn and LA/Hollywood/Beverely Hills. I mean not 100% of the world's population but a good chunk do. Follow-up with DC, SF, Chicago, Boston, Miami, and maybe the others (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Dallas).

Last edited by g500; 10-07-2017 at 05:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 10:49 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,868,827 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by g500 View Post
Yeah you know, I was thinking that Pheonix, Seattle, and Minneapolis are questionable as being big time cities to virtually everyone. Just depends. I'd love to do a thread called "what are the most recognizable/esteemed U.S. cities among the world". My guess is that even the some of the most oblivious/remote people should still know about or have heard of NY/Manhattan/Brooklyn and LA/Hollywood/Beverely Hills. I mean not 100% of the world's population but a good chunk do. Follow-up with DC, SF, Chicago, Boston, Miami, and maybe the others (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Dallas).
No need, just look at any CvC thread and the subject immediately flows into NYC, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Miami, and DC. It's like the same topic over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 12:51 PM
 
130 posts, read 122,873 times
Reputation: 78
Ranking by land area, Dnever MSA is bigger than New York MSA.

Here is Largest Urbanized Areas With Selected Cities and Metro Areas(MSA),

https://www.census.gov/dataviz/visua...ns/026/508.php

Last edited by zlxt; 10-29-2017 at 01:41 PM.. Reason: Updated
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 01:11 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,619,238 times
Reputation: 7117
There are 382 Metropolitan Statistical Areas. By 2020, there will be 55 or 56 of them that have populations of 1 million plus. Only 55 or 56, of 382...

It's fair to say that a city is a large city once it crosses 1,000,000 metro persons. That isn't a small place; there are literally hundreds of urban areas smaller than that coast to coast...

I'd rather just stick with that. There is a difference between "big" and "major". Few cities over 1 million are major cities, but any city with at least one million people metro is not a small city...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 01:26 PM
 
1,642 posts, read 1,397,539 times
Reputation: 1316
Just the city is an anchor. Albany NY is an anchor good or bad; Providence, Worcester and Manchester Kind of depend on Boston, it does come with economic advantages. I would say Springfield, MA even though it has a few big companies kind of depends on Hartford for employment.

So when I say big city Worcester or Providence are bigger than Albany but Albany is the hub of a region. Providence has its own metro but ehhhh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top