Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-30-2009, 06:09 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,114,186 times
Reputation: 2037

Advertisements

I see the Houston- LA link in the way the cities look. Both cities "sprawl" obviously (I know LA is more dense), but the development patterns in both cities are similar. In my opinion, both cities have a certain grit and are developed in a haphazard, organic way. The way both cities have gentrified, increasingly make them look similar. Geographically, they are totally opposites. But, yet there is a connection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2009, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
2,848 posts, read 6,434,352 times
Reputation: 1743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Houston is what LA was several decades ago. Since then, LA has made it a huge effort to become alot more dense. This is what Houston is aspiring to do. But Houston is a different city than LA but I would say it is the Southern version of LA.
I don't think L.A. chose to become more dense. It just was forced to. Because of it's popularity more and more people kept moving in. It couldn't develop to the West to accomodate these people because of the Ocean. Couldn't to the North because of the Mountains. Could only develop so far East before you get into the desert and so far South before you are in expensive Orange County or San Diego.

So if people wanted to keep moving into L.A. they would have to live in a denser set up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 07:23 PM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,987,215 times
Reputation: 7328
Only in the world of city-data could Houston and L.A. be seriously debated as being similar to the point of Houston being called "Baby L.A.".

Houston is Houston and L.A. is L.A. When I think of either one, neither is in the same conversation.

About the only things they have in common are a large city proper and a large sprawling suburbs.

Whatever happened to cities wanting to best each other, instead of being seen as equal to a rival?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 07:30 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,496,781 times
Reputation: 5879
Quote:
Originally Posted by wpmeads View Post
Well Austin is more a city for the younger crowed: young families, young professionals, and college students. If you don't keep up with independent/underground music and film, than your probably not going to "get" Austin. But Austin also receives flocks of people from California and all over the country for various festivals. Although, the crowds at these festivals are fairly diverse, they do tend to mostly be white. I would think for the black community, Houston would be the biggest attraction in Texas.
Yeah I'm a "young professional" but don't really "get" Austin, I'm not into the hipster or indie scene or college scene or college football so it wouldn't really do much for me. I'd prefer Houston or Dallas. When I think of Austin I thin of the website "stuff white people like"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 09:06 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,923,687 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthmoreAve View Post
They both have multiple skylines, just another similarity that I'm throwing out there....
Oh yeah, that's another one I forgot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 09:38 PM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,987,215 times
Reputation: 7328
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Yeah I'm a "young professional" but don't really "get" Austin, I'm not into the hipster or indie scene or college scene or college football so it wouldn't really do much for me. I'd prefer Houston or Dallas. When I think of Austin I thin of the website "stuff white people like"


I always think about that site when people go on and on about "diversity", San Francisco, and density. Basically it's all code words that this post really breaks down to a science: #91 San Francisco « Stuff White People Like
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,023 posts, read 4,185,234 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by waronxmas View Post


I always think about that site when people go on and on about "diversity", San Francisco, and density. Basically it's all code words that this post really breaks down to a science: #91 San Francisco « Stuff White People Like
I love that site!! that was actually my first thought as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 12:38 AM
 
306 posts, read 319,513 times
Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaterry78259 View Post
The two cities have a lot in common
LOL. NO, these two cities have NOTHING in common.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 01:00 AM
 
Location: ITP
2,138 posts, read 6,317,763 times
Reputation: 1396
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
Houston still has a strong southern and conservative culture. The Downtown areas can look similar at time, and some areas resemble eachother. However, Houston will grow up to be its own. I know the black community in both LA and Houston have a strong connection. However, the same could said for the blacks in the Bay area and Houston as well.
I don't think you'll get a better answer than this! ^^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 01:05 AM
 
Location: ITP
2,138 posts, read 6,317,763 times
Reputation: 1396
BTW, LA is LA. There is no other place like it. As far as a part of Texas that may resemble California the closest, I would have to go with Austin and the Hill Country. The rolling green hills covered with live oak, as well as some of the homes in the hills with Spanish architecture, are very reminiscent of California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top