U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Which skyline looks better?
Dallas 217 33.44%
San Francisco 432 66.56%
Voters: 649. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,831 posts, read 21,035,048 times
Reputation: 6721

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CGTSS View Post
Not really. Even without the hills, bridge and water , SF's skyline is still looks much better than the Dallas skyline.
Great picture, but the only thing impressing me about it is the density. This comparison is like the Montreal vs. Houston.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia,New Jersey, NYC!
6,970 posts, read 13,182,053 times
Reputation: 2503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely95 View Post
I think in scenery SF is the lead, but skyline wise its Dallas.
possibly, if they replaced the lollipop with a spire

sorry couldn't resist
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,268 posts, read 5,699,198 times
Reputation: 644
The only thing the Dallas Skyline lacks is density! If Dallas had density the skyline would be better!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:43 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,190 posts, read 7,128,154 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladarron View Post
The only thing the Dallas Skyline lacks is density! If Dallas had density the skyline would be better!
That is what puts SF's skyline over Dallas's for me. SF's density isn't just something to be casually referenced when compared to Dallas; it's simply overwhelming. The two skylines are honestly in two different leagues. It just is what it is.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:48 PM
 
594 posts, read 1,051,997 times
Reputation: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
That is what puts SF's skyline over Dallas's for me. SF's density isn't just something to be casually referenced when compared to Dallas; it's simply overwhelming. The two skylines are honestly in two different leagues. It just is what it is.
Yes, and pictures dont do justice to SFs skyline. Ive been to both cities many times, and while I much prefer Dallas' skyline to Houston's, I really dont think it can compare to SFs in person, at all.

To me, SF or Philly are easily 3 or 4 (after NYC and Chicago, of course). Dallas doesnt belong in this conversation...
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 03:02 PM
 
6,046 posts, read 6,647,299 times
Reputation: 2211
Density is so overrated. I actually like the lollipop in Dallas.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,268 posts, read 5,699,198 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by city_data91 View Post
Density is so overrated. I actually like the lollipop in Dallas.
I do to! The name of the tower is not lollipop it is REUNION TOWER!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,268 posts, read 5,699,198 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_starks View Post
possibly, if they replaced the lollipop with a spire

sorry couldn't resist
The Reunion Tower makes the Dallas skyline unique!

Last edited by ladarron; 11-27-2009 at 04:52 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
13,855 posts, read 15,946,768 times
Reputation: 5339
Quote:
Originally Posted by city_data91 View Post
Density is so overrated. I actually like the lollipop in Dallas.
Well it's debatable if it's overrated or not. But density is one of the key points in judging a skyline. San Francisco easily wins this. Density is much more pleasing to the eye.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,268 posts, read 5,699,198 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Well it's debatable if it's overrated or not. But density is one of the key points in judging a skyline. San Francisco easily wins this. Density is much more pleasing to the eye.
The main reason SF is dense is because SF does not have that much space! 46.7 sq mi that is almost how much water Dallas has in its city limits!
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $94,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2015, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top