|
View Poll Results: Which skyline looks better?
|
|
Dallas
|
  
|
197 |
33.50% |
|
San Francisco
|
  
|
391 |
66.50% |
|

08-12-2012, 10:29 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Texas
710 posts, read 410,782 times
Reputation: 416
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MB8abovetherim
Dallas like just about every other Texas city lacks density. That bugs me. It's either a super tall skyscraper or a parking lot  Somewhere along the way during these city's development people must have been retarded because I notice that most Texas downtowns look great from a distance but at the street level there really isn't anything going on.
|
5 yrs ago I would have been saying the same thing. For example Austin is becoming a dense urban city, the real estate market is HOT and developers are buying up land. I can't even count how many project are proposed or under construction in Austin.
|
|

08-12-2012, 12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: The Mid-Cities
303 posts, read 181,555 times
Reputation: 127
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX
5 yrs ago I would have been saying the same thing. For example Austin is becoming a dense urban city, the real estate market is HOT and developers are buying up land. I can't even count how many project are proposed or under construction in Austin.
|
Same goes for Dallas. Not many tall buildings above 30 stories have been built in the past decade but I can't even begin to name all the midrises, townhomes, condos that have been built or are getting built in and around downtown Dallas. To me these residential midrises are adding way more density than the office highrises built in the 80's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX
Dallas has a nice skyline but San Francisco's just looks bigger next to the bay. Wouldn't mind borrowing some buildings from Dallas. I like San Francisco's more obviously but I can acknowledge Dallas's nice skyline.
|
Best response so far. Preference without resorting to plain bashing while acknowledging the other's strengths. 
|
|

08-12-2012, 01:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Rose Capital of The World
9,815 posts, read 8,466,243 times
Reputation: 3398
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_starks
SF is a midrise city with talls but dense
Dallas has the talls, but not tall enough
|
While Dallas doesn't have any "super talls" like cities such as NYC, Chicago, Houston, or LA it does have some pretty tall buildings in its skyline.
Most notable are the Bank of America Plaza (green neon building), Renaissance Tower (XX building), & Reunion Tower (golf ball building).
|
|

08-13-2012, 01:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,404 posts, read 1,969,509 times
Reputation: 815
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MB8abovetherim
Dallas like just about every other Texas city lacks density. That bugs me. It's either a super tall skyscraper or a parking lot  Somewhere along the way during these city's development people must have been retarded because I notice that most Texas downtowns look great from a distance but at the street level there really isn't anything going on.
|
You can that the 80s for that. Dallas was dense back then but a lot of structures were demolished for skyscrapers, but a lot of them were not built. So, the land was turned into parking lots.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Similar Threads
-
Chicago Skyline vs. San Francisco Skyline., City vs. City, 202 replies
-
Skyline battle: Which of these North American cities has the best combined architectural and natural skyline?, City vs. City, 75 replies
-
LA skyline versus Dallas skyline, City vs. City, 145 replies
-
Skyline Battle: Minneapolis Skyline versus Philly Skyline, City vs. City, 10 replies
-
Atlanta skyline versus every city skyline in America, City vs. City, 16 replies
|