Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which skyline looks better?
Dallas 218 33.44%
San Francisco 434 66.56%
Voters: 652. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2009, 11:46 AM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,835,591 times
Reputation: 3101

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustCallMeTC View Post
Sorry to the Dallas folks, but the problem with Dallas is Dallas. Other than steel and glass, there's nothing else there. The topography sucks. The weather is oppressively hot in the summer. It's a God forsaken dustbowl. Deep Elum is cool though.

Alas, the score reflects reality.
Sorry but those 6.5 million Dallas residents love Dallas topography. Gee I mean Dallas has added more residents than any metro since 2000. "People vote with there feet not there mouth" Hmm and Dallas is winning.

 
Old 11-26-2009, 12:32 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
79 posts, read 92,007 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Sorry but those 6.5 million Dallas residents love Dallas topography. Gee I mean Dallas has added more residents than any metro since 2000. "People vote with there feet not there mouth" Hmm and Dallas is winning.
The only reason they move is because of cost of living. People don't move to Dallas for culture, architecture, amenities, etc,.... they move there because it's dirt cheap.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 12:57 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,835,591 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGTSS View Post
The only reason they move is because of cost of living. People don't move to Dallas for culture, architecture, amenities, etc,.... they move there because it's dirt cheap.
As I stated before people vote with there feet and Dallas is winning. You have to very ignorant to think Dallas offers nothing but is the fastest growing metro in the country. Billionaires could live anywhere in the country but yet a big chunk of them choose Dallas to live in. I wonder why?
 
Old 11-26-2009, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Houston
529 posts, read 1,300,637 times
Reputation: 374
SF gets my vote
 
Old 11-26-2009, 02:35 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
79 posts, read 92,007 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
As I stated before people vote with there feet and Dallas is winning. You have to very ignorant to think Dallas offers nothing but is the fastest growing metro in the country. Billionaires could live anywhere in the country but yet a big chunk of them choose Dallas to live in. I wonder why?
They don't choose to live in Dallas, they live where they are established/made their billions.

And the people contributing to Dallas' fast growth are voting with their empty wallets...not necessarily their feet. Cheap cost of living and low taxes. Middle-Americans don't really care about culture, amenities, architecture, topography or whatever - they want low-taxes and cheap property so Dallas gains.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,285,888 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGTSS View Post
They don't choose to live in Dallas, they live where they are established/made their billions.

And the people contributing to Dallas' fast growth are voting with their empty wallets...not necessarily their feet. Cheap cost of living and low taxes. Middle-Americans don't really care about culture, amenities, architecture, topography or whatever - they want low-taxes and cheap property so Dallas gains.
No, if you have money, you live where you want.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 05:09 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
79 posts, read 92,007 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by thePR View Post
No, if you have money, you live where you want.
UM, no.

Billionaires very rarely relocate.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,244,491 times
Reputation: 466
hmmm...i dont think Billionaires are relevant. I mean look at Omaha,NE. Just because Warren Buffet lives there doesnt mean its a world-class city with tons of amenities. Now, i know comparing Dallas to Omaha is a big stretch , but Omaha has the same billionaires per 1 million people as Dallas(7.4) Omaha having 3 billionaires is extraordinary given its size AND location.

But, yeah, Dallas does have a LOT of billionaires for a city of that reputation. But that doesnt mean that its a good city by anyones standards. Props to Dallas anyway...

Also, look at Ft. Worth, it has 1 more billionaire residing there than Houston with 7. Does that mean Ft. Worth is better than Houston? It doesnt add to city comparisons, much.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
7,731 posts, read 13,424,908 times
Reputation: 5983
San Francisco.
 
Old 11-26-2009, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Sorry but those 6.5 million Dallas residents love Dallas topography.
They settle for what's available. People don't go there and say "How beautiful". In SF, that's exactly what people say.

Quote:
Gee I mean Dallas has added more residents than any metro since 2000. "People vote with there feet not there mouth" Hmm and Dallas is winning.
Maybe because its dirt cheap?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top