Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: City skyline that would best suit a "NEW TALLEST BUILDING" in the country or the world?
New York City 38 32.20%
Chicago 40 33.90%
Los Angeles 11 9.32%
Seattle 4 3.39%
Houston 17 14.41%
Miami 8 6.78%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2015, 02:03 PM
 
Location: New Orleans
591 posts, read 776,386 times
Reputation: 464

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Philadelphia called. They said, "We already did it"

http://www.globallp.info/UploadFiles/20096863356173.jpg

Chicago called, they said "Same here"
Two Prudential Plaza

 
Old 02-08-2015, 03:36 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,678,927 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTownWonder View Post
Chicago called, they said "Same here"
Two Prudential Plaza
they do look a lot alike though weren't the Liberty towers built a few years prior in the 80s

everytime I see that building it always makes me think of the Liberty one and two towers.
 
Old 02-08-2015, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,146,996 times
Reputation: 2136
^^You mean the Twin Towers?
 
Old 02-08-2015, 05:46 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,291 posts, read 1,511,864 times
Reputation: 747
I'll always be a cheerleader for NYC getting the tallest building, but I think LA would look amazing from 140 stories up ... despite the earthquake potential.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 07:52 AM
 
10,787 posts, read 8,663,690 times
Reputation: 3983
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
they do look a lot alike though weren't the Liberty towers built a few years prior in the 80s

everytime I see that building it always makes me think of the Liberty one and two towers.
Liberty Place I broke ground on May 13, 1985 and was finished by 1987. I don't remember when Liberty Place II opened. Maybe 1989 or 1990. As I recall the architect of both was from Chicago or at least his firm was there.

The guy who proposed the idea, of building a building taller than Philly's City Hall's tower, was Willard Rouse.
It was quite a battle to convince people about it but he finally won out. He died about 15 years ago. I don't think many people know, today, who he was. And it's impossible to imagine Philadelphia's skyline now without those towers.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 07:59 AM
 
5,390 posts, read 9,623,780 times
Reputation: 9978
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyb01 View Post
Liberty Place I broke ground on May 13, 1985 and was finished by 1987. I don't remember when Liberty Place II opened. Maybe 1989 or 1990. As I recall the architect of both was from Chicago or at least his firm was there.

The guy who proposed the idea, of building a building taller than Philly's City Hall's tower, was Willard Rouse.
It was quite a battle to convince people about it but he finally won out. He died about 15 years ago. I don't think many people know, today, who he was. And it's impossible to imagine Philadelphia's skyline now without those towers.
I'm glad they went for the whole "allowing buildings to be taller than Billy Penn's hat".... I'm sorry, but that was kind of s stupid tradition to even uphold for so long. Today's skyline of Philly is quite nice because of their tall sky scrapers. I especially like the Liberty Place buildings as well as the Comcast building, which is quite a site to behold.... without those buildings Philly's skyline would be drab and lack that "va va voom" big city vibe IMO.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 10:42 AM
 
Location: East Central Pennsylvania/ Chicago for 6yrs.
2,535 posts, read 3,254,658 times
Reputation: 1483
I don't think Phillies's height limit till the 80s.... hurt its arrival and skyline? If anything..... it spared them some taller plain boxes? They got lower scale examples of in the 60s 70s. The timing of lifting it, was about right. Philly probably will not get Super-Tall luxury living high-rises soon? Like NYC, Chicago or Miami. But for offices/hotel and mixed use.... a Super-Tall yet could come?
 
Old 02-11-2015, 01:21 PM
 
Location: New Orleans
591 posts, read 776,386 times
Reputation: 464
Quote:
Originally Posted by steeps View Post
I don't think Phillies's height limit till the 80s.... hurt its arrival and skyline? If anything..... it spared them some taller plain boxes? They got lower scale examples of in the 60s 70s. The timing of lifting it, was about right. Philly probably will not get Super-Tall luxury living high-rises soon? Like NYC, Chicago or Miami. But for offices/hotel and mixed use.... a Super-Tall yet could come?
A super tall is coming to philly.
 
Old 02-11-2015, 04:26 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,678,927 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTownWonder View Post
A super tall is coming to philly.
under construction as we speak

a hotel/office not condos - will have a lounge similar to to the Hancock in Chicago on top (part of the new Four seasons) and outside facing glass elevators to the top floor - think will be the tallest such elevators in the US

there is a 780 foot office/condo and a 600 ft condo/hotel underway as well with the FMC and SLS

The new 580ft W went into construction this week (well really site prep for construction)

still love me some Chicago scrapers though...
 
Old 02-11-2015, 05:31 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,720 posts, read 23,628,503 times
Reputation: 14551
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
I'd put it in a city with a weak skyline so that it would stick out more and give their skyline at least something for the world to appreciate.
In that case put it in Denver. It has a good base skyline to surround a supertall, unlike OKC where it looks out of place. Denver has a nice vibrant downtown but its downtown skyline hasn't had very much an update since the 80's.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top