Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2010, 06:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego
415 posts, read 1,209,966 times
Reputation: 136

Advertisements

You know what I think is really strange though is that Charleston SC used to be the largest and still is the oldest ports in America, so why is it not like other cities its more like slums now! What happened?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2010, 07:31 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,210,159 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPerone201 View Post
Houston, Louisiana, and Newark-Elizabeth are the busiest ports.

Thought Port Everglades was the busiest? Oh wait is the second busiest seaport. Your right though! I just looked up those three locations and indeed they are the busiest.

Port Canaveral is the second busiest cruise port in the world. I dont know how they measure how much a port is busier by.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 02:03 AM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,472,270 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsteelers247 View Post
Not necessarily...Sure they are the busiest based on cargo tonnage, but there are other factors. Such as volume, amount of containers, traffic, etc.
True, and from that angle the top port cities are:

1. Los Angeles
2. Long Beach
3. Newark/NYC
4. Savannah
5. Oakland

List of busiest container ports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 02:18 PM
 
1,604 posts, read 3,884,409 times
Reputation: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
I'm thinking:

South Louisiana (Greater New Orleans)
Houston
NYC
New Jersey
Beaumont or Port Arthur?
Los Angeles
New Orleans (city proper)
Baton Rouge
Mobile

The NYC ports merged with the ones in North Jersey for form the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which has nothing to do with the ports in Camden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,919,808 times
Reputation: 973
It seems to me that the best measure of a port's significance is to measure by total value of cargo. Any numbers for that criteria?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
8,289 posts, read 23,102,936 times
Reputation: 5687
Louisiana, Long Beach, Houston and Port of NY/NJ are really the only true big ports the rest are peanuts compared to those I mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,455,268 times
Reputation: 4395
This is such a lame debate, just look up the offical stats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 03:55 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,860,458 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by stefansanity View Post
You know what I think is really strange though is that Charleston SC used to be the largest and still is the oldest ports in America, so why is it not like other cities its more like slums now! What happened?!
Charleston is "more like slums now"? Every city has its rough parts and Charleston is certainly no exception, but it's easily one of the most beautiful cities in the nation.

But as for why Charleston never really kept up with its historical peers, the Civil War/Reconstruction ravaged the local economy, you had the big earthquake of 1886 that nearly decimated the city, and more recently there was Hurricane Hugo in 1989 and the closure of the naval base in 1996 which was a big economic blow to the city. Charleston didn't have the textile industry to help prop up its economy like other regions of SC and the piedmont of NC, which is why cities like Winston-Salem and Charlotte surpassed it in population in the early part of the 20th century. It wasn't really until the historic preservation movement started to really pay off under Joe Riley's leadership in the 70's and 80's that Charleston started to grow again. The city is poised for a mini-boom in the near future with recent economic developments like the new cruise line and the Boeing plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top