U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Which of these cities has the best skyline?
Seattle 124 49.40%
Portland 1 0.40%
San Francisco 75 29.88%
Los Angeles 42 16.73%
San Diego 9 3.59%
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-09-2010, 03:53 PM
 
1,992 posts, read 4,317,411 times
Reputation: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhymes with Best Coast View Post
Exactly!

Imagine a slightly bigger and taller Denver vs. a smaller but just as dense version of Manhattan.
Except Seattle is twice as dense as Denver,and Manhattan is astronomically more dense than San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-09-2010, 06:54 PM
 
594 posts, read 918,988 times
Reputation: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by toughguy View Post
Except Seattle is twice as dense as Denver,and Manhattan is astronomically more dense than San Francisco.
In terms of structural density Manhattan is certainly more dense than SF, but its not astronimical. San Francisco has remarkable structural density, 2nd only to NYC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 06:59 PM
 
3,965 posts, read 6,641,222 times
Reputation: 1562
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroJimmy2 View Post
In terms of structural density Manhattan is certainly more dense than SF, but its not astronimical. San Francisco has remarkable structural density, 2nd only to NYC
Not sure what "structural density" means, but wouldn't Chicago be #2? What am I missing? per square mile? Then, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 07:13 PM
 
Location: East LA
13 posts, read 31,517 times
Reputation: 39
Los Angeles

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2732/...3c7e6b45_b.jpg

Last edited by JMT; 05-29-2013 at 08:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 07:52 PM
 
1,992 posts, read 4,317,411 times
Reputation: 739
I think this is a good angle of Seattle, which shows off some density, which you don't really get a chance to see when passing by on the freeway (thanks Pwright!).
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2594/...b2e00030_b.jpg

Last edited by JMT; 05-29-2013 at 08:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 08:12 PM
rah
 
Location: San Francisco
3,086 posts, read 4,824,450 times
Reputation: 2154
Quote:
Originally Posted by toughguy View Post
Except Seattle is twice as dense as Denver,and Manhattan is astronomically more dense than San Francisco.
Manhattan is not astronomically denser than downtown San Francisco though, and that's what the comparison was (or at least that's what i assume, seeing as this is a thread about skylines). The buildings/skyscrapers in downtown SF are packed just as dense as in Manhattan, and a couple parts of downtown SF have population densities higher than Manhattan's average density:

Chinatown - 75,055 people per sq. mile
100,574 residents
1.34 sq. miles

The Tenderloin - 71,694 people per sq. mile
25,067 residents
0.35 sq. miles

Manhattan - 71,201 people per sq. mile
1,634,795 residents
22.96 sq. miles

The Tenderloin and Chinatown posses census tracts that reach 100,000 people per sq. mile too...Manhattan and Downtown SF are actually very similar in both structural and population density
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:33 PM
 
3,965 posts, read 6,641,222 times
Reputation: 1562
Quote:
Originally Posted by erin3465 View Post
Theres no doubt that in person SFs skyline is far more impressive. It is nearly twice as big, the density is far greater, and the architecture of the buildings is better in SF (although it doesnt look as cool from a distance). Just look at the closeups of the buildings posed earlier.

Seattle's skyline is not nearly as impressive as some pictures would have you think...
"nearly twice as big". Hmm. On what basis do you claim this? Please provide facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 10:35 PM
 
902 posts, read 1,495,232 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by pw72 View Post
"nearly twice as big". Hmm. On what basis do you claim this? Please provide facts.
For me pictures of SF's skyline does not do it justice. Pictures make it seem small, but in person it is huge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 10:38 PM
 
1,694 posts, read 3,359,849 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by gogetta View Post
For me pictures of SF's skyline does not do it justice. Pictures make it seem small, but in person it is huge.
Same,no picture can show you how the city really feels when you coming over the bridge,or when you're looking down from twin peaks or bernal heights or across from telegraph hill or any hundreds of angles or just standing downtown.
Btw,go sounders! (when the season starts )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 11:04 PM
 
2,050 posts, read 3,768,163 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by rah View Post
Manhattan is not astronomically denser than downtown San Francisco though, and that's what the comparison was (or at least that's what i assume, seeing as this is a thread about skylines). The buildings/skyscrapers in downtown SF are packed just as dense as in Manhattan, and a couple parts of downtown SF have population densities higher than Manhattan's average density:

Chinatown - 75,055 people per sq. mile
100,574 residents
1.34 sq. miles

The Tenderloin - 71,694 people per sq. mile
25,067 residents
0.35 sq. miles

Manhattan - 71,201 people per sq. mile
1,634,795 residents
22.96 sq. miles

The Tenderloin and Chinatown posses census tracts that reach 100,000 people per sq. mile too...Manhattan and Downtown SF are actually very similar in both structural and population density
I lol'ed.

Manhattan = 1.6 MILLION people. Tenderloin + Chinatown = 130k.

Manhattan is just as dense with nearly 10 times the amount of people. To compare SF to NYC is alright, but it's no where close to the same expansiveness of NYC..

And I pick Seattle, it's one of the great skylines of the world... let alone the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top