Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is better?
Fort Worth 62 45.93%
San Jose 73 54.07%
Voters: 135. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-12-2010, 09:11 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,099,045 times
Reputation: 4670

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
New suburban tract homes in San Jose, from Silicon Valley History online:


...from SJ Rotary:




...from America Hurrah:

That last one is after the 1906 quake, centered up north. Still looks in better shape than Texas Boy's argument, though.
I not a texas boy, Anyways are you saying 21,500 in 1900 to 95,280 in 1950 San Jose, is like 26,668 in 1900 to 278,778 in 1950 Fort Worth?
Fort Worth developed a larger urban core before both cities sprawl with tract housing After the 50s.

File:Fort Worth c1920 loc 6a14633.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

stockyards - Google Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2010, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592
I think the bottom line is that both these cities are overshadowed by their big brothers (Dallas and San Francisco respectively). Yet both are unique to them and both have lots to offer. Not to mention both are criminally underrated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 10:00 PM
 
902 posts, read 2,786,904 times
Reputation: 375
How are they criminally underrated??? As in they have low crime rates? If that is the case than SJ is a whole lot safer than FW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 10:16 PM
 
46 posts, read 59,383 times
Reputation: 40
Fort Worth Urban Core














http://www.flickr.com/photos/25564050@N02/3070164642/in/photostream/ (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by gogetta View Post
How are they criminally underrated??? As in they have low crime rates? If that is the case than SJ is a whole lot safer than FW.
No, I didnt mean it in a literal sense. Maybe I should have said "They are so underrated that its criminal". Again, I dont mean it in a literal sense. Its just an illiteration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 10:41 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,344,980 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiatldal View Post
I not a texas boy, Anyways are you saying 21,500 in 1900 to 95,280 in 1950 San Jose, is like 26,668 in 1900 to 278,778 in 1950 Fort Worth?
Fort Worth developed a larger urban core before both cities sprawl with tract housing After the 50s.

File:Fort Worth c1920 loc 6a14633.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

stockyards - Google Maps
Your whole premise is based upon the assumption that no urban development took place after the middle of the century. That's seriously flawed.
BVN San Jose 1975-2006
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:06 PM
 
198 posts, read 653,776 times
Reputation: 156
All those nice pictures of Ft Worth and it still does not have this...


or this..


Yea, Ft Worth has pretty lights on their buildings..
San Jose lights up the map period.


Dont get me wrong, Dallas/FTW and Houston are my preffered cities over the entire south.
Miami is included in that opinion..
But the bay area? come on.. this is the Technology capital of the country.
San Jose is beautiful.. its expensive because everone wants to live there.
I'll let you know how many earthquakes its had in the next 20yrs.
Let me know how many tornadoes Ft Worth gets in the next 6 months.
Its amazing to see 3 major city skylines from one location..
Fort Worth may have more highrises, but thats because theres a monster sitting 15mi north of SJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:14 PM
 
46 posts, read 59,383 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyrsc View Post
All those nice pictures of Ft Worth and it still does not have this...


or this..


Yea, Ft Worth has pretty lights on their buildings..
San Jose lights up the map period.


Dont get me wrong, Dallas/FTW and Houston are my preffered cities over the entire south.
Miami is included in that opinion..
But the bay area? come on.. this is the Technology capital of the country.
San Jose is beautiful.. its expensive because everone wants to live there.
I'll let you know how many earthquakes its had in the next 20yrs.
Let me know how many tornadoes Ft Worth gets in the next 6 months.
Its amazing to see 3 major city skylines from one location..
Fort Worth may have more highrises, but thats because theres a monster sitting 15mi north of SJ.
Yes those are nice, but we are specifically comparing Fort Worth and San Jose not the entire bay area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:32 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,099,045 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
Your whole premise is based upon the assumption that no urban development took place after the middle of the century. That's seriously flawed.
BVN San Jose 1975-2006
NO I never said that there were no urban developments that took place after the middle there the century, but most of the development after middle of the century is sprawl in both cities. In that case the urban development that took place after the middle of the century plus the urban core development in Fort Worth that developed before middle of the century, Fort Worth is urban more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2010, 01:18 AM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,927,598 times
Reputation: 4565
I like BOTH of these cities. I'd live in BOTH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top