Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Could the USA make it without California and New York City?
Yes 124 67.39%
No 60 32.61%
Voters: 184. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2010, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,759,681 times
Reputation: 693

Advertisements

What if New York City and California succeed could the USA make it without them?

 
Old 04-25-2010, 04:56 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,888,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Much less easily than without TX, but yes
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,032,687 times
Reputation: 4047
Yes, after all we have to appreciate our country for what it's good at.
And that's diversification. Unlike countries like UK, or France where the largest city/region, is the main source of the economy and culture, we have cities through out the country at every corner that can hold their own.

The media will suffer though, because both of which are mainly in California or New York.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,822,779 times
Reputation: 7801
are you kidding me? it would arise without those dead weights
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:28 PM
 
370 posts, read 371,898 times
Reputation: 43
Let's put it this way, if it wasn't for LA and NYC (but mostly LA, of course) no one would even know where the USA was or what it's important for. The entire nation is in debt to these two places.

So, you should all be on your knees and thanking us for keeping the rest of the fly-over country on the world's radar. Without us, you're nothing but cows and cornfields. Good luck with that.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:30 PM
 
Location: NYC
10 posts, read 7,286 times
Reputation: 14
Let's put it this way, if it wasn't for LA and NYC (but mostly NYC, of course) no one would even know where the USA was or what it's important for. The entire nation is in debt to these two places.

So, you should all be on your knees and thanking us for keeping the rest of the fly-over country on the world's radar. Without us, you're nothing but cows and cornfields. Good luck with that.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:36 PM
 
2,881 posts, read 6,086,417 times
Reputation: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoneandonlyLA View Post
Let's put it this way, if it wasn't for LA and NYC (but mostly LA, of course) no one would even know where the USA was or what it's important for. The entire nation is in debt to these two places.

So, you should all be on your knees and thanking us for keeping the rest of the fly-over country on the world's radar. Without us, you're nothing but cows and cornfields. Good luck with that.
Uh-huh,

and that kind of attitude is exactly why some folks hate on LA. LA has Hollywood, but film didn't come from there. So what then?

The entire nation is in debt to those two places for no one thing anymore than it is in debt to smaller, not as highly tiered cities, i.e. Detroit: The current setup for the nation is built around the automobile. So what then?

A city, is not a city without its surroundings as in it cannot be made to support its size. What is the brain without the body? An organ.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,687,113 times
Reputation: 6262
Chances are if NYC and LA hadn't developed, other port cities would have developed into the equivalents.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:43 PM
 
2,881 posts, read 6,086,417 times
Reputation: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladarron View Post
What if New York City and California succeed could the USA make it without them?
There are circumstances to be pondered about your question like:

If the two were to secede would they be a part of other countries or would they simply be regions?

I ask b/c simply, the new, somewhat smaller United States would simply establish trade with these two regions.
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,759,681 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66nexus View Post
There are circumstances to be pondered about your question like:

If the two were to secede would they be a part of other countries or would they simply be regions?

I ask b/c simply, the new, somewhat smaller United States would simply establish trade with these two regions.
They would be independent countries.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top