U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 04-30-2010, 04:10 PM
 
370 posts, read 171,515 times
Reputation: 43

Advertisements

Please limit your responses to cities/metros with > 1 million people.

 
Old 04-30-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,172 posts, read 8,797,427 times
Reputation: 4047
I've never disliked a place before. So I have zero preference on this.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
289 posts, read 763,604 times
Reputation: 132
Detroit or Baltimore or Atlanta
 
Old 04-30-2010, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,977 posts, read 25,008,438 times
Reputation: 7016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermolas View Post
Detroit or Baltimore or Atlanta
Why???
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:00 PM
 
Location: The better side of the Mason-Dixon Line
4,937 posts, read 9,244,683 times
Reputation: 2550
Miami or El Paso if the illegal immigration is not put under control, then the illegals will technically not be in America anymore. After that, San Francisco (not including Silicon Valley). I'm not a fan of New York with its rude attitudes, unfriendly people invading the South, its liberalism, etc but NYC is economically critical and while the South is rising again the West is economically becoming dominant NY is still important. most of the money in Miami comes from foreign countires anyway and most of the banks there are based in Latin America like Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, etc. El Paso is also overrun with illegal Mexicans and drug runners.

San Francisco itself is a nice tourist attraction but if I had to choose a second city to kick out after Miami they would be it Frisco with the gay movement, liberalism, hippies, anti-Americanism, etc. However Silicon Valley has to stay because of the immense economic impact and contributions to the nation and the world.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:00 PM
 
Location: The land of Chicago
867 posts, read 1,486,822 times
Reputation: 1119
Prob. Detriot, just not sure the city can make a comeback, GM would be a loss, but we'd still have Ford and Chrysler
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,524 posts, read 18,373,187 times
Reputation: 4890
Right now...Washington as long as Obama is part of the package deal.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:15 PM
 
2,563 posts, read 4,047,704 times
Reputation: 819
Get rid of Los Angeles.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:19 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,972 posts, read 18,702,070 times
Reputation: 6996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
Miami or El Paso if the illegal immigration is not put under control, then the illegals will technically not be in America anymore. After that, San Francisco (not including Silicon Valley). I'm not a fan of New York with its rude attitudes, unfriendly people invading the South, its liberalism, etc but NYC is economically critical and while the South is rising again the West is economically becoming dominant NY is still important. most of the money in Miami comes from foreign countires anyway and most of the banks there are based in Latin America like Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, etc. El Paso is also overrun with illegal Mexicans and drug runners.

San Francisco itself is a nice tourist attraction but if I had to choose a second city to kick out after Miami they would be it Frisco with the gay movement, liberalism, hippies, anti-Americanism, etc. However Silicon Valley has to stay because of the immense economic impact and contributions to the nation and the world.
Yeah b/c it must be really "American" to want to kick out a city b/c you don't like their politics or the type of people there. Your stereotyping and ignorance here is beyond nauseating and very anti-American.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:21 PM
 
Location: The better side of the Mason-Dixon Line
4,937 posts, read 9,244,683 times
Reputation: 2550
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Yeah b/c it must be really "American" to want to kick out a city b/c you don't like their politics or the type of people there. Your stereotyping and ignorance here is beyond nauseating and very anti-American.
Well the politics determinate who becomes the President of the ENTIRE United States so getting rid of some liberals will make America a better place, and preventing Obama from being elected again.

Plus ILLEGAL immigrants are not Americans are they? Both San Francisco and South Florida probably will vote Democrat, and probably will support people who are sympthetic to illegal immigrants and that will negatively impact the entire country. I wonder if San Francisco was not included if California would still even be a blue state. There are many Republicans and conservatives in Southern California, including MANY in San Diego where you are, Palm Springs and Orange County. I've heard its because of the illegal immigration and anchor babies that are changing the politics of California.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

2005-2016, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top