Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Chicago area does not even come close to matching the Bay Area, not even close.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urza216
A lot of Chicago suburbs have racial integration and affordability.. Unlike the lily-white expensive Bay area suburbs!
Here, instigator one meet instigator two. Please PM each other your ignorant flame messages and leave the rest of us out of your idiocy. Thank you both.
And I agree with Lifeshadower and 18Montclair, that dead horse pic would be the perfect to this thread.
Chicago has the better city, but SF has the better suburbs
I agree with this for the most part... most people forget that the bay has three big cities though (Oakland, SJ, SF) all with their own airports. All are very different from each other... very different. I prefer the bay to the chicago area because once you're out of the city of Chicago... Illinois is one of the last states I would want to live in. Chi>>SF but CA >>>>>>>>>>IL
Wow, the Bay Area has much more diverse suburbs than Chicago does.
Maybe the NORTHWEST suburbs of Chicago...
My suburban white ass has lived around minorities my whole life - unlike Bay Area white suburbanites who get all nervous at the mere sight of a black person. These are the demographics of my SUBURBAN community college in Chicago Heights, Illinois:
Black - 2,628
White (non-Hispanic) - 1,809
Hispanic - 594
Asian / Pacific Islander - 79
American Indian / Alaskan Native - 28
Race Unknown - 151
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.