Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cleveland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-10-2008, 02:34 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,635,426 times
Reputation: 3870

Advertisements

Plain Dealer article

Quote:
More people left Cleveland last year than any other major city in America... about 5,000 people between July 2006 and July 2007... [Cleveland has] dipped to an estimated 438,042 people.
Has this situation turned around at all since July of last year, and the spike in gas prices? Or is there still an ongoing population decline within the city?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2008, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
3,844 posts, read 9,284,985 times
Reputation: 1645
I like two quotes from the article:

1) "Take a breath. We didn't get here overnight," Hill said. "It's going to take a good 15 years to get out of it. But we need to do this through growth, through creating opportunity."

-and most importantly-

2) "Cleveland's rate of decline slowed in 2007, a year when several major cities -- including Baltimore and St. Louis -- saw rates of decline accelerate. And the numerical loss was the lowest in five years."

Interesting to note that our rate of people leaving and number of people leaving has been decreasing for the past few years, so it isn't as bad as it seems-- we're in fact getting better! I like the year number estimate for rebounding population from the above quote, but I would even saw give it ten years before the rate of decline gets to zero and begins again with the upward swing. We're on pace to get there!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2008, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Cleveland
3,070 posts, read 11,923,957 times
Reputation: 998
Correction: Cleveland didnt lose the most people, the population just declined at the highest rate. Im not very surprised though, its been losing people for a long time, currently the population is around 439,000. Im pretty sure that Detroit, Buffalo, Youngstown, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, Baltimore, and a few other cities are right behind Cleveland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2008, 06:16 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,589,940 times
Reputation: 8922
Cleveland needs to do a "Youngstown" to properly handle the lower population in an orderly manner. IE plan for it without all this "we will be 500K population soon again" BS.

Happy thought of the day. Cleveland is a boomtown compared to Detroit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cleveland
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top