first --the judge lowered the bail requirement significantly--but she did not just "let him walk"
########OK--i read it is UNSECURED bail--meaning no money up front--
so she did just let him walk
the issue for me is that
1--I think he needs to be in jail, in isolation-- for protective custody-- because if he is outside he can be killed and I don't want anything to come between him and 1200 years in prison
2--the prosecution asked for an ankle monitor to track him and the judge did not allow that--
I find that MORE disturbing really than the low bail--
if you aren't going to have him in protective custody then the police need to know where this guy is at all times--and the fact that the judge did not see why that was warranted is pretty good proof that there are undercurrents to this case that everyone knows are there and no one is addressing overtly...except in the media and blogs...
and this report just up on Internet (at least I just saw it)
3--
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/15...-on-child-sex/
someone who was high up in Second Mile was big fundraiser for Dutchcot--
so there is even more reason to claim conflict of interest and recuse herself from that bail hearing--
RED FLAG!
Chris Mathews MSNBC show tonight had a talking head lawyer guy who made a good point about Sandusky's interview with Costas and the attorney's comment that they thought they knew who the boy in the shower was and he would back up Sandusky--no rape...
IF this incident was so normal, natural, unthreatening, just a coach and his best pal hanging around in the showers "like they always do"--so there is nothing UNUSUAL about it in any way
how did Sandusky even remember who the boy was???? after all this time...
why would Sandusky remember McQueary walking past the showers on that night in question WHEN NOTHING WAS ABNORMAL!
Supposedly nothing confrontational happened between them...nothing McQueary really brought out in his testimony (like shouting at Sandusky, pulling them apart,)...
Sandusky supposedly thought nothing strange of what he was doing with that kid...
why would he even remember???
Paterno, Curley, Schultz--nothing in GJ testimony to reveal what they said to Sandusky about that night and what McQueary said to Sandusky if he saw him later on/off campus...
is it even possible that trio never really talked to Sandusky about this at all--
that those three guys among themselves just decided to make him turn in his keys to the gym and turned their backs on what he was doing???
remember AT THAT POINT he was not an employee of the university--and in their twisted minds I guess they could use that to justify NOT calling his ass on the carpet...
of course I think they knew already what he was doing--that is why they forced him to resign in 98 or 99
they just wanted to lock him out of their bldgs--no access unless someone else might be there already--like the football players who worked out with him even this month...
and he was not supposed to bring those kids on campus--
like people dealing with someone they know with drug or alcohol addictions--
don't do it around me--don't contaminate my house, my environment--if I can't stop you, at least I don't want to risk having it in my face...