I wouldn't ask people not familiar with urban planning graduate programs to rate schools. Often time they rate them on overall prestige and/or town, athletics program, etc. and not on the quality of the actual program (Which is understandable, why would the average Joe know anything about urban planning master's programs).
When I was applying to graduate programs I quickly realized that the prestige of the school was very seldom affiliated with the prestige of the actual institution as a whole.
For example, in my concentration the University of South Florida and Bowling Green State University are two of the top 5 programs. You would never know that by simply asking someone on a board to compare schools, in fact many would rank them towards the bottom. When put in with Maryland, UConn, Penn State, Purdue, Michigan State, Minnesota, Univ. of Illinois, etc.
I would focus more on the actual programs. What classes will you be taking, what do the professors research, and what are the relevant statistics you want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamplouno
I was actually looking at UB and am waiting on an information packet from them concerning their admissions standards. I'm not too concerned with the reputation of the school as I hope to continue to get a Ph.D. and prove my ability not with where I went, but what I did while I was there.
|
If you plan on continuing for your PhD I would make sure the faculty are doing research in areas you enjoy/find interesting. It is very difficult to branch off into your own field of research, especially at the master's level. So I think this becomes exceptionally important and should be your top consideration if you want to eventually pursue a PhD.