Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2012, 02:54 AM
 
Location: NYC
2,427 posts, read 3,982,492 times
Reputation: 2300

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobaba View Post
Perhaps possible, but not likely the norm. You're saying that a PHD program in Chemistry would take a person from No Name Local State University who did two summers of minor research for a professor (who are way too busy with their grad students and classes to give undergrad students meaningful structured research assignments) with a 3.0 and mediocre test scores over somebody who has a 4.0 from Harvard and perfect GRE scores with zero research experience because they were busy getting a 4.0 at Harvard.

You're right. I don't believe you.

Undergraduate research is usually trivial stuff. I've done it.
it depends on the school. at top 10 ranked PhD programs, research is the only thing that matters, simply because all of the applicants have extremely high GPAs/GREs. in your example, neither of the applicants is getting into such a program. but don't take my word for it, take a CMU professor's

at top 100 PhD programs, i think the harvard student has a large advantage in your example, but it depends on the quality of the essays and rec letters, as well as how trivial or not the research was

i went to a top 10 ugrad school and am teaching at a good, but regional public school. i am fully convinced a 3.5 GPA from a top school means a lot more than a 3.5 from a place like WPU, and feel admissions offices probably agree with me

master's programs are sometimes treated as cash cows so i feel admission to them is harder to predict
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Undergraduate research is far from trivial. It's where you learn to research, create arguments, write up grant proposals and publish papers. All of this does quite a bit to prepare you for graduate studies.

However, I'm not certain it has an impact on admissions as much as it does in terms of your success in graduate studies.
I am not so certain that is the case for law school though. Law school tends to want you to do things their way so you have to unlearn a lot of what you learned in ug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 01:57 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,325 posts, read 12,995,234 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
I am not so certain that is the case for law school though. Law school tends to want you to do things their way so you have to unlearn a lot of what you learned in ug.
Law school admissions are notoriously un-holistic compared to other fields of graduate study. I'd argue that only four of the top 100 schools admit on a truly holistic basis. It's really just grades and LSAT. It's rather ironic, considering that the legal profession itself is notoriously obsessed with prestige.

For most fields of study, your UG doesn't make a huge impact in and of itself, but the law school admissions process is probably the only one where it isn't even taken into account 95% of the time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 03:19 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenWood View Post
Law school admissions are notoriously un-holistic compared to other fields of graduate study. I'd argue that only four of the top 100 schools admit on a truly holistic basis. It's really just grades and LSAT. It's rather ironic, considering that the legal profession itself is notoriously obsessed with prestige.

For most fields of study, your UG doesn't make a huge impact in and of itself, but the law school admissions process is probably the only one where it isn't even taken into account 95% of the time
Just out of curiosity what are the 4 schools?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 03:36 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,325 posts, read 12,995,234 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Just out of curiosity what are the 4 schools?
Yale, Stanford, Berkeley, and to a lesser extent, Harvard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 05:41 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenWood View Post
Yale, Stanford, Berkeley, and to a lesser extent, Harvard.
That is interesting I would think UVA and UNC would be on there because of the high instate preferences lessening the numbers game aspect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 06:52 PM
 
12,101 posts, read 17,083,796 times
Reputation: 15771
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenWood View Post
Yale, Stanford, Berkeley, and to a lesser extent, Harvard.
Ironic that Berkeley would have a holistic admissions process for anything indeed...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 07:37 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,325 posts, read 12,995,234 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
That is interesting I would think UVA and UNC would be on there because of the high instate preferences lessening the numbers game aspect.
While they may have to relax their standards somewhat to fill in-state quotas (UNC probably not as much, since they are not as selective), they still want the most numbers-impressive in-state candidates they can get.

Of course, this isn't to say that numbers are the absolute only thing taken into account, and in fact, soft factors are usually used as tiebreakers between candidates of near-equal numbers. But other than those candidates "at the margins," it's pretty strictly a numbers game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top