Quote:
Originally Posted by MinasIthil
My words that you have quoted should have been self-evident given that I have provided the quotations that I was responding to. The supposed confusion between 'competitive/higher chance' and 'guarantee' clearly began with Timberline not with Minas Ithil (though he did later correct his equation).
I simply hold the phrase 'higher chance of being accepted rather than rejected' to its non-back-kissing intentions. Every other 'interpretations' made literally less sense (UCLA not knowing/incapable of rationally estimating the number of applicants, for instance, is patently false given their same excuses 10-20 years ago).
As per usual, it seems like my threads are being answered by habitual gas-lighters rather than by ethical individuals. You sub-forumers can continue group-masturbating to each others' answers, I am tired of re-clarifying my positions repeatedly.
|
Got it....so in your alternate reality universe 60-40 equals a "guarantee"
If you were even remotely capable of stringing together a cogent response you wouldn't need to keep "re clarifying your positions" clearly that is asking too much....