Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicWizard
WARNING: If you are are addicted to Doom and Gooom, do not read this article. The hint of optimism in it will spoil your day!
Here's a brief quote from an article in Fortune magaizine titled: This crisis could have a happy endingAnd there's the rub. I believe that in order for the market to achieve a sustainable advance that is above the mean, we are due for some unforeseen positive event or events. Think about it. In the 1990s stocks went way up because of an unanticipated revolution in technology, i.e., networking and the Internet. In this decade we had a slew of unexpected negative events - bookended by 9/11 and this current meltdown. At some point, and it may be a few years from now, we will likely be subjected to an unforeseen positive.
|



I have to raise the BS flag here.
Aw, c'mon wiz, the NASDAQ crash of 1999-2000 showed in unequivocal terms that the meteoric rise of the tech market in the 90's was
NOT due to the information revolution nearly as much as it was a mania-driven bubble fueled by the deadly combination of irrational exuberance and excessively cheap money. The NASDAQ peaked at around 5300...today--9 years later--it's below 1400. In inflation-adjusted terms, it's still down close to 90%. No, sorry, but holding out the tech bubble as something
positive is
positively ignorant on the part of this author.
I prefer to look at this market in the context of the 1920s, where we saw the inflation/bursting of twin bubbles, first the real estate manias in the midwest and Florida in 1922-25, and then the stock bubble, which ended in a spectacular two-day crash in Oct 1929. The twin bubbles of the NASDAQ (1994-1999) and the nationwide but especially the CA-NV-FL-AZ real estate bubble (1995-2006) are eerily similar to the events that set the conditions for the First Great Depression from 1929-1941.
And thanks to Congress, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley act, passed at the urging of the Robber Barons of Wall Street like then-Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson (you know, our current treasury secretary) stripped away the regulatory protections that were put in place to prevent another 1929-style bubble and crash.
And that leaves us at today, with the S&P down nearly 50%, and trust me, poised to go considerably lower still.
I have no doubt that things will someday improve, but we've got a hard-knocks lesson to learn (again) that I think will take 10-15 years. And I hope that we won't see WW III in the meantime. Would not surprise me at all if the Israelis nuke Iran's uranium processing facilities before Jan 20th, because I think they are very nervous about the Palestinian company that BO has been keeping the last few years.
Anyway, the referenced article is an example of blind optimism based on selective memory. The 1990s tech bubble was a train wreck, not something to hope for again in the future.