![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Another case in point...I recently bailed out of a big-name mainstream tax-free mutual fund when I discovered it held a large amount of housing-agency VRDOs (Variable-Rate Demand Obligations) in its portfolio. VRDOs are a type of auction-rate bond generally considered (by the Wall Street crowd) very safe and like cash. So how many folks realize that there were over 1,000 failed auctions for tender-option and other auction rate bonds just in the last week? That's the first time ever that has happened. So many people are flocking to MM funds right now that it's masking the unhappy fact that some MM funds are holding a large amount of auction-rate securities that they now can't sell--buyers for them have left the market. People cashing their MM funds out now can be paid with the cash inflows from people coming into the fund...but when net cash flow to those MM funds goes negative as people start to leave for greener pastures, things could get very interesting. Auction rate securities are becoming more illiquid by the day, and there's a real risk that funds heavily invested in them may not be able to sell them to cash out sellers when they need to. And the first time a MM fund tells its buyers they can't pay them...well, there's no mechanism in place (like the FDIC for banks) to stop a run on one or more MM funds. That flies in the face of the commonly held belief that MM funds are "same as cash." And the issuers of these auction-rate bonds--municipalities & other public agencies, hospitals, etc, are seeing the rates on these securities skyrocket when the default rates kick in--many of them are the same agencies that are being lambasted by falling tax revenues due to the housing market. How many people have ever bothered to look under the covers and see what their money-market funds are doing with their money? And how many are truly aware that a MM account, even from their bank, may not be (in fact, probably isn't) FDIC-insured? How many ignored the caveat at the beginning of the MM fund prospectus that says MM funds can, though rarely, lose value? Now is the time to QUESTION EVERYTHING. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
In case anyone had any doubt about how evil the Wall Street derivatives trade has really become...this one should bring up your gag reflex.
You can bet your life this policy will end in tears - Business Analysis & Features, Business - Independent.co.uk |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob from down southe wrote:
NewAgeRedneck--after reading the thread again, I wanted to make sure my replies aren't interpreted as attacks...in retrospect they are rather strongly worded.I've never thought of your words as a personal attack. You don't seem like the type of persoan to levy a personal attack. I mostly agree with everything you're saying. And that goes for Jazzlover too. I think that both of you are simply telling it like you see it. Nonetheless, no one has yet posted a specific action they have taken based on reading your posts...that was my point. It's all just discussion that no one seems to be acting upon. Meanwhile, the readers of this thread are absorbing greater and greater amounts of doom and gloom, so now we have even greater amounts of doom and gloom pervading the atmosphere. Additionally, the likelihood of positive change is further comprimised because people are more inclined to do something stupid when thery are in a state of gloom. Personally, I've already taken some steps to simplify my life but I did all of that before I knew this forum existed. I've made a lifelong habit of living below my means. That has always been common sense to me. My 10 year old car only gets 20 mpg, but I drive about 80 miles a week, so I'm OK with that. I'm still using far less gasoline than the PRIUS driver who drives 300 miles a week, and I'm contributing alot less wear and tear on the highways. My sainthood cannonization is scheduled for next week. You're all invited! ![]() Last edited by NewAgeRedneck; 02-18-2008 at 10:29 AM. |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
i don't walk around or back away from the doom and gloom psychology, but i walk straight through it because i know that it's just talk and words can't harm you. for the most part, it's temporary and the "bad" won't be as bad as most doomers think. you will not fear the future when you've prepared for the worst, but live each day for the best.Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think there's more herd behavior to be found in the happy-go-lucky crowd than in the doom-gloomers. That herd mentality is exactly what built this mother of all bubbles in housing and credit in the first place.
The bewildered looks on the faces of the sheep when they get the notices in the mail shutting off the HELOCs on their rapidly devaluing houses could be the subject of one of those "priceless" ads. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
This column on MSN should give Coloradans some real pause:
The year's scariest investing news - MSN Money The gist of it is that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. is increasing its investments in more volatile and risky securities because it needs the higher returns from those securities to stay solvent. In other words, the government agency that insures pension funds is essentially going to the casino to gamble in order to cover its potential liabilities. Individuals who behave that way financially are called fools. The article explains the political reasons that the PBGC has taken this course, which once again illustrates that the government and its elected officials are being every bit as irresponsible as debt-ridden Americans are about confronting the fact that we have lived beyond our means and have created a huge debt and liability bubble that is going to have to deflate. Anyone who has a pension coming should be plenty concerned about this. There is ample evidence that a number of private and public pension funds have been either mismanaged or underfunded--or both--and may face insolvency in the years ahead--particularly if the economy sours. Now, the agency that insures those funds, and would step up to pay those pensioners if a fund failed, may not be very solvent or viable itself. Great. Why should this bode much additional pain for Colorado compared to other US locales? Well, because Colorado has a good chunk of its current funny-money economy based on retirees and other pensioners heavily reliant on those pension fund payments. Worse yet, a whole lot of economic speculation, real estate development and speculation, even infrastructure improvements have been predicated on the assumption that the "retirement economy" and the income from it are guaranteed and sacred. Couple that with a potential souring of many retirees' non-pension investments (a darned strong possibility), and real problems and anguish may lie ahead in the new silver (haired) economy in much of the Rockies and Southwest. The toxic waste just keeps seeping out of the US's speculative, increasingly non-productive, and overcomsumptive economic cesspool . . . |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't sugar coat it Jazz, tell us how you really feel about it... ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
i don't think i'd want to own property in or downstream of leadville!
The Associated Press: Colorado Town Fears Avalanche of Water |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Bills shift Leadville tunnel load to feds - The Denver Post Last edited by suzco; 03-01-2008 at 05:26 PM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
By the way, a lot of that tailings contamination were from mines abandoned after the first big boom in Colorado--artificially inflated by the federal government much like the current one in real estate--went bust when the Sherman Silver Purchase Act was repealed in 1893. History may not exactly repeat, but it does reprise the same melody an awful lot. Last edited by jazzlover; 03-01-2008 at 06:42 PM. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|