![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
/Also, Multitrak, can you post that article in Denver forum... I've been saying this all along. I live in a very desirable part of Denver (WAsh Park) and am selling and want to buy in a VERY VERY deisirable part of Denver metro- Southern Hills/Cherry Hills Heights. Things in that area are definitely appreciating and hard to come by these days.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sure that prices in Beverly Hills are holding up as well.
In every market, there are bound to be some affluent areas that buck the general trend. And every realtor in town wants us to believe that those areas define the general trend as well, which is just Pollyanna blather. And to suggest that performance in these small affluent neighborhoods can be used to define the bottom for the market as a whole? Pure wishful thinking. In the last depression, the extremely wealthy were still extremely wealthy, and I'm sure property values in their favored playgrounds stayed high, just as I'm sure that we won't see Gulfstream V luxury business jets listed in the Aurora Green Sheet anytime soon. At the moment, I'm just a bit more focused on where the center of the bell curve finds itself. The red areas still outnumber the green ones on the map in the USNWR article. And we're just getting warmed up with respect to disappearing availability of easy, no/low downpayment credit to buy even in the nicer neighborhoods. How many people really have the close to $90,000 in cash needed to close on a $400K house with 20% down? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Breaking news" from the Denver Post:
Metro home sales, prices slide in March Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Still too high.....
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
not much new here...the denver case-shiller housing index declined 5.1% year over year 01/07-01/08 (released on mar 28) vs. 6.3% decline 03/07-03/08. the number of unsold homes appears stable 02/08-03/08 and 914 lower from last year. it's amazing how a negative headline can bias the reader to seemingly bad news that really not all that bad... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]() $240K for a home is NOT unreasonable. I worked with builders and building a well-built, 2,400 sq.ft home with 4 beds and 3 bath, with nice finishes, good windows, tile, etc. is not a cheap endeavor. Once your down paying all the subs, your lucky to come out ahead with some money after all your time, labor and risk. No offense, but when I see people complaining that $240K for a newer, well-built and equipped home is still too expensive and they need to come down to $180K or less. I'm sorry, but if you can build a home like that, AT COST, for $180K, more power to you. Start building. Call me when your done... ![]() The reality is labor, supplies, permits, equipment, etc, good quality finishes, costs a lot of money. If you ever done construction work on your own, you will change your tone, and fast. Materials alone cost a lot. Let alone, the labor, which is the hard part, costs even more. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
i guess that's why there's 45% renters in denver co.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where did you get that stat, mulit? I had no idea it was that high!
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|