Quote:
Originally Posted by baileyco
Hmm. I see there were about 88 pages, few of which that don't include a post by yourself along the lines of "the economy is in bad shape, and gonna get worse", yet few have become "snarky" over that nor its repetition. To me, seems fair enough!
Also, I am not seeing much commentary on this thread concerning relationships between climate, natural resources, and the CO economy. I'm actually not seeing any concerning climate, but there are a lot of posts. Maybe you could point the ones I'm missing out to me?
To me, it seems like some common threads might have to do with "special interests" and their influence on the population, the culture, the politics, the consumption, etc. and what can pan out of that (i.e., environmental change and the economic woes you so loquaciously expound upon - not mutually exclusive phenomena, and worthy and relevant directions to consider, seems to me). And perhaps the echo back of a culture that enables these things? Maybe that was a point of the previous post asking about the relationships between these things?
|
I think I have made several posts here and elsewhere about the relationship among resources, the "environment," and how those things may be affecting our national and local well-being--economically and otherwise.
Herewith, is an example: I read an article this morning about rising fuel costs, fertilizer costs, and transportation costs contributing to a decrease in potato planting in the San Luis Valley this year estimated at 30%. Now, this may seem unimportant to a lot of suburban Coloradans, but it is something they should be worrying about. Most current Coloradans don't know it, but our mountainous, seemingly infertile state used to produce most every crop, aside from citrus and other tropical fruits and vegetables, that one could think of. Lettuce, spinach, corn, wheat, fruit, barley, beans, potatoes, hay, milo, watermelons, cantaloupes, carrots--the list goes on an on. Not to mention cattle, sheep, hogs, chickens, turkeys, dairy products--all kinds of livestock. Most all of those crops and livestock grown in Colorado have diminished considerably over the last 30 years. Why? Land and water lost to suburbanization, and changes in farm and ranch economics (some of it aggravated by development pressures) that made it unprofitable to raise some crops.
Well, so what? "We'll just get that stuff somewhere else." Unfortunately, that may not be so easy. Historically, one of the US's major agricultural advantages has been that ag production has been both diverse and distributed across the country. If a crop disease, flood, or drought affected one area of the country, there was production from another region that could make up the shortfall. Sadly, that is increasingly no longer true. Right now, there is the potential for a major shortfall in grain production from a good chunk of the Midwest due to wet spring and flooding there. We may not be able to make up the difference from elsewhere. Not good.
Transportation costs may also make cross-country transportation of ag products much less feasible in the future. So, there may come a time that having little ag production available locally in Colorado may mean that some Coloradans don't have enough to eat. No doubt someone will say that we can just ramp ag production back up here if that happens. Such a person has probably never worked in ag (I have) and has no clue what it takes to bring land back into production--especially land that has a subdivision sitting on top of it. That is an "inter-relationship" of environment and economics that people--including Coloradans--should be thinking about. It seems like a little thing, maybe, but I'd be a lot more comfortable if a full crop of potatoes was growing down in the San Luis Valley right now, and if Colorado still had a vibrant fruit industry, and if Colorado still produced a lot of high quality vegetables, and if Colorado water was being used to grow crops and nurture sub-irrigated pastures and wetlands instead of growing non-native lawns, and if . . . well, you get it.