Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-13-2017, 06:34 PM
 
998 posts, read 1,237,346 times
Reputation: 1512

Advertisements

Park City ... A real town, 40-45 minutes to SLC, draws plenty of South Americans with $$$ (it seems as though every fourth car is a Cayenne Turbo), lower altitude, terrific free bus system, so many places are on the bus line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-13-2017, 07:08 PM
 
541 posts, read 394,388 times
Reputation: 1752
As we are approaching retirement age and would love to be a less hot/humid climate in the summer, I looked into possibly purchasing a condo in a ski area. First thoughts were rent it out in the winter and other times of the year and stay there in the summer. The numbers though just didn't look good at all. I explored a few different options in a few different places. I think the best way to make money would be to be a property manager lol. Property management fees really take a lot of your rental income. And carrying costs are significant for the condos.


And this next point may be obvious, but if you live in your condo for more than two weeks a year or 10% of the rental days, tax advantages are limited. Here is an explanation from another source.


"If you use the home personally for more than the greater of (a) 14 days, or (b) 10% of the rental days, you are using it “too much,” and you cannot claim your loss. In this case, you can still use your deductions to wipe out the rental income, but you cannot go beyond the income to create a loss. Any deductions you cannot use are carried forward and may be usable in future years."


With a regular rental property, depreciation can go against other income you have which can be quite advantageous if you have a high marginal tax rate.


Anyway, I strongly suggest that you crunch the number. Doing that in a few different places with a few different options made it super apparent to me that this was not a good idea for us. // If you are quite affluent and can take a big hit (negative cash flow) and want to do this, sure. // I, though, was really surprised at the size of the negative cash flow projections for options I looked at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top