Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430
Ummm...the state DOES support the bus system though. Check SCDOT's website for funding that goes to local transit agencies including Columbia's.
|
I'm talking about as a permanent funding source silly. That much should have been obvious since I mentioned that before.
Quote:
Why shouldn't USC support the bus system also? The city sure as heck can't. It is a major university located in the heart of downtown Columbia afterall. Clemson University students pay for the bus system that runs through their city with a $10 transit charge on tuition per student.
|
USC has its own on-campus shuttle service so it doesn't need to support the bus system since most students don't use it. Things are different in Clemson since the university and the town are practically synonymous.
Quote:
Oh and i'm willing to bet the CITY did spend a ton of money on Innovista that could have gone to the bus system instead. How much though is unclear. If you want to keep getting mad at me over lack of research due to another failure in Columbia then go right ahead because I don't really care.
|
The city spent $35 million to go towards Innovista facilities at a time when there were no funding issues for the bus system. And this is not a "failure," it's simply a setback as the bus system has not failed. I suppose you don't know that Charleston had the exact same problem but the voters there supported the penny tax after they saw the negative effects of such drastic cuts in the bus system. But I guess you didn't have time to start a thread about that in the Charleston forum now did you?
And to even bring up Innovista, which is totally unrelated to the bus system, is absurd. It's quite premature to talk about a long-term venture like Innovista failing after only about four years. It took longer than that to get RTP off the ground.
And obviously you
do care, otherwise you wouldn't have even created this thread.