|
I agree with Kharisma on the point that as neighborhoods age, lifestyles and taste change.. many neighborhoods may begin to go through the cycle that has existed in many of our inner cities. The problem with some of the older burbs is that the ones that enter into this cycle may fall quicker than the inner city neighborhoods did particuliarly if some of these developments were built on the cheap in terms of durability/quality. Most of the public largesse is being directed towards downtown/urban cores or the "new" development in exurbia and not aging suburbs or inner burbs particularly in many southern cities whose inner burbs are not as large, old, developed, nor incorporated municipalities as are the older/inner burbs of many larger cities. I do think the County needs to take a look at its long range plans and zoning standards because it may be inadvertantly creating opportunities for some communities to decline in the future. If developers are allowed to cram a large number of large homes on to small lots or create these super dense but sprawling communities, provide little or no open space or landscaping, no thought given how the ingress-egress from these neighborhoods interface with existing neighborhoods and thoroughfares or how they impact schools they can create a receipe for future problems that cause many communities to decline. Certainly developers are looking at their bottom line and the affordability for buyers, but there has to be some obtain a middle ground in effort to build sustainable communities.
|