U.S. Cities  
Happy Thanksgiving!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Columbia area
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Columbia area Columbia - Lexington - Irmo

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 02-18-2009, 10:01 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbia, SC
24 posts, read 12,248 times
Reputation: 22
RybarSC is on a distinguished road
Default Columbia's statistics are deceiving

One of my pet peeves is whenever I hear someone say that the population of Columbia is 125,000. It's true that this is the "official" population inside city limits, but the Columbia MSA is downright bizzare with how it is layed out, and the "city limits" really have no meaning at all.

Whenever someone from out-of-state asks me how big Columbia is, I tell them around 700,000 people. And, truly, that is a much more accurate number than 125k. The 125k is not counting Forest Acres, Arcadia Lakes, West Columbia, Cayce, Blythewood, Irmo or Lexington. I can maybe see Lexington or Blythewood being it's own town, but there is absolutely no reason for any of the other towns to even exist. In my opinion, they should all be part of the City of Columbia. For example, I work in Forest Acres and live the Old Woodlands neighborhood. Statistically speaking, I neither live nor work in the city of Columbia, so I don't "count" at all when it comes to Columbia's median income, per capita income, population, etc.

Of course, none of these towns will ever allow itself to become part of Columbia, but my point in this post is to say that, realistically, there is no distance at all between the towns, except for invisible "city limits." As a resident of Columbia, you will travel through all of these "towns" throughout the week, whether to work, eat or shop, and they will be just as much "Columbia" to you as the actual "city." They are all part of Columbia. You will be living in a city of roughly 700,000 people. From a realistic perspective, the number 125k is completely irrelevant.

Just wanted to point this out to anyone looking at Columbia. Unfortunately, a lot of the most affluent parts of Columbia are not in city limits (especially Forest Acres) which really brings down Columbia's relative median income, compared to other cities that don't have ridiculous towns located WITHIN another city!

Last edited by RybarSC; 02-18-2009 at 10:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2009, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, SC
2,562 posts, read 2,122,163 times
Reputation: 369
waccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nicewaccamatt is just really nice
Send a message via Yahoo to waccamatt
^That is correct; Columbia's metro population is almost 750,000 and the urban area population is around 500,000. Because of restrictive SC annexation laws our cities can't annex like cities in NC can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 11:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
665 posts, read 492,236 times
Reputation: 83
Woodlands will become famous soon enoughWoodlands will become famous soon enough
Eventually Forest Acres and Arcadia Lakes will be engulfed by Columbia... though not annexed...which may suite them both just fine. They have a very stable tax bases and if the old Richland Mall (in FA) is ever redeveloped they certainly will fare better than most cities of similiar size in SC.. But I agree that all these hamlets and fiefdoms detract statistically from the whole..Arcadia Lakes seems like a very sophisticated homeowners association as opposed to an actual town. I am surprised that the developers of Harbison never incorporated back when it was developed? The idea of having planned community with a mix of retail, recreation, and residential would seem to justify incorporation back then (late 70s?) to control and fund improvements in the development....back when planned communities in this area were not common. Are not the convenants and assessments in Harbison somewhat sophisticated and expensive compared to your average HOA that simply collect dues for signs and a flower bed...considering that Harbison has trails, rec centers etc??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Columbia area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top