|

04-08-2009, 03:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: HELL a.k.a Columbus, GA
239 posts, read 151,133 times
Reputation: 59
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLCOL1
I found out where you got your bogus info.....ecanned.com, you have got to do better than that ROFL  .
|
Do you read anything?  The ecanned.com website says where they got the information at the bottom of the article. If the Census Bureau is "bogus" then heaven help us.
Let's assume that your assertion that the info on ecanned is bogus is correct. What possible reason would they have for posting bogus economic information about over 20 states?
"The Editors of eCanned.com will frequently post geographically tailored data analysis to the blogs of appropriate regions. This content is considered as open-source content. The use of this content is welcomed as long as eCanned.com is appropriately referenced. The data used to generate the geographically tailored data analysis will typically come from the public domain (i.e. Census Bureau) and will be properly referenced in the eCanned Blog Posts." (before you go off on that specious path, the added emphasis is mine)
Source: About | The Economy in a Can
|
|

04-08-2009, 04:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
909 posts, read 755,261 times
Reputation: 43
|
|
|
All that matters for this thread is the articles I have posted. Try to dispute those. Enough said and case closed.
Thank you
|
|

04-08-2009, 04:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
909 posts, read 755,261 times
Reputation: 43
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerplay
It looks as though nobody else is responding to this nonsense so i guess I will let this thread close too...
You just cannot give reputable answers.... 
Moderators can close this thread as well..thanks
|
All I can say is wow  . Apparently, you haven't read a word in this thread. Can't wait to see your response 
|
|

04-08-2009, 04:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: HELL a.k.a Columbus, GA
239 posts, read 151,133 times
Reputation: 59
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLCOL1
All that matters for this thread is the articles I have posted. Try to dispute those. Enough said and case closed.
Thank you
|
You do understand that projections are not facts, right? Projections are merely estimates of what is expected at some point in time. Until these projections come to fruition and become facts, they are subject to being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLCOL1
2) BRAC will bring an additional $25-35 million to the Columbus economy
monthly
4) Expected to create an additional 11-13,000 new jobs in the Columbus
area
5) Population growth expected to start in October of this year
6) Total population growth expected to top out in September of 2011
9) Total population growth projected to be 39,737 people
|
Notice a pattern here?
As for the first article you posted, Jeffrey Humphreys is the Director of the Selig Center and it sounds so similar to the article that was published in the Ledger. Georgia Trend was simply re-publishing what has been the subject of debate for months now. There's nothing new there either.
Last edited by saharaga; 04-08-2009 at 04:31 PM..
|
|

04-08-2009, 04:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
909 posts, read 755,261 times
Reputation: 43
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saharaga
You do understand that projections are not facts, right? Projections are merely estimates of what is expected at some point in time. Until these projections come to fruition and become facts, they are subject to being questioned.
Notice a pattern here?
As for the first article you posted, Jeffrey Humphreys is the Director of the Selig Center and it sounds so similar to the article that was published in the Ledger. Georgia Trend was simply re-publishing what has been the subject of debate for months now. There's nothing new there either.
|
First off, you have a very weak argument. You just can't stand the fact that this is going to happen. Don't you think the United States military knows how to calculate these things? Did you come up with this info....hmmmm.....let me think.....NO. I noticed how you avoided several of the statements since they are facts. The government is a little smarter than you when it comes to calculating troop movements, growth, estimated economic impact, etc. So on than note, your credibility in this forum has dropped. When you have a good argument I will admit you do. I am an adult. But buddy, to have your argument based on "projections" is just plain weak. Will all this come out to be true...more than likely no. The population could end up being slightly smaller and the economic impact larger. Who knows. What I do know is that the U.S. Government has been working on this for years so I tend to believe them.
BTW, Selig is definitely a credible sourse. Do some research or give them a call.
Case closed 
|
|

04-08-2009, 07:43 PM
|
|
Professional Bit Twiddler
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mableton, GA USA (NW Atlanta suburb)
3,844 posts, read 2,882,810 times
Reputation: 533
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLCOL1
Case closed 
|
The case is never closed on City-Data as long as the  button remains. 
|
|

04-09-2009, 10:05 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Watch the time!"
(set 25 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
517 posts, read 519,240 times
Reputation: 59
|
|
Are you guys ok? You guys seem to be getting upset over old info (2005 and 2007), based on statistical estimates. The two key words are statistical and estimates. They don't mean much, they just keep the mathematicians busy and keep the math illiterates confused. The only info that is true and factual are the poverty and initial unemployment numbers the state of GA compiles. The real info based on actual head counts and much larger sample sizes will be out in 2011 or 2012, at that point in the future you guys can reload and come out fighting. Please take a break. Try some exercise, it really does relieve stress. It's such a nice day, go for a walk in one of the numerous parks in the area. 
|
|

04-09-2009, 10:27 AM
|
|
The power within... Like what am I talking about??
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Munich, Germany
3,106 posts, read 839,369 times
Reputation: 1034
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerplay
We are talking about the last 8 years and not just recent economic conditions unfortunately.... 
No booming city has a near 24 percent poverty level.
|
Atlanta's poverty rate is 21% or so, and it's a booming city.  
|
|

04-09-2009, 09:36 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
909 posts, read 755,261 times
Reputation: 43
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nature's message
Atlanta's poverty rate is 21% or so, and it's a booming city.  
|
Exactly, when you have some education you understand these things. Thanks for the information.
|
|

04-10-2009, 08:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
208 posts, read 164,276 times
Reputation: 34
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLCOL1
Exactly, when you have some education you understand these things. Thanks for the information.
|
Remember we are talking about Columbus the economic oasis not Atlanta poverty.
Like comparing an apple to an orange.
Please stay on topic.....still waiting for your credible info. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|