![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Grove City and Hilliard are OK, but I would choose Worthington over either. I have never understood Worthington to be regarded as snooty, that applied to New Albany, Dublin, Powell and Upper Arlington, but not to Worthington.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And the idea that "grove city is bad" comes from the thought of suburb VS suburb. People from suburb A want to believe that it is drastically different than suburb B. However, in reality there is little large differences among them. The differences are smaller things like number of minorities, home ages, etc.. They are in the same region, the midwest, in the same metro, Columbus, and have similiar housing styles and are all very car oriented and post WWII construction. The only suburbs that have drastic differences are between the Inner Ring Suburbs and the newer Outerbelt suburbs. The inner-ring suburbs have older, usually expensive homes and have smaller school districts. These are areas like Upper Arlington, Grandview, and Bexley. The outer ring burbs that grew after the 70s and are based mostly outside or slightly inside of the outerbelt (Westerville, Dublin, Hilliard, Pickerington, Reynoldsburg, Grove City, Powell, and Worthington.) Though Worthington has the most developed downtown, urban like area of all of the "newer" suburbs. In reality almost any of the suburbs are a good place to raise a family. And many areas of Columbus are a great place to raise a family too. Last edited by streetcreed; 01-09-2008 at 10:29 PM.. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope that was not suppose to be directed towards me... otherwise i would have to tell you that maybe you should live in Worthington with the other snotty people.... but only if that was directed towards me
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I totally agree with you, we lived in Columbus for a long time, then Cleveland for a couple years and now live in San Diego and I found Columbus (surprisingly) to be the most status conscious place of the three.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Based on housing, I would try Grandview or Upper Arlington. They have older houses that I think would suit you, and are nice places to live. Grandview is very safe, and is located right outside the city. It's small, young, and very personable. Upper Arlington, is more upscale. The town itself is rich-old money, not new. I honestly don't know much about either school system, but you could look up their report card online. Another place you may like is New Albany. It does not have old homes, but it is safe, has a good school system, and is nice. It's more rural, but is not far from everything that you need. It is a ritzy town though...and has a highly populated elementary school..as for the secondary grades, I'm not sure. Other than that I'm not sure what to advise. The suburbs are booming faster than they can get the schools built. Pickerington has a good school system, but it is becoming extremely hectic-especially for a daily commute out of the city. Honestly, any of the cities I named, along with Westerville, Worthington, and Gahanna all have nice-old-down town parts that give the city character, and make you fall in love with them. They are all nice areas that have become crowded, but are safe. They are not that far apart from each other-I would recommend that you take a day and drive around the cities before you decide. That way you can get a feel of them, and see what fits you best. As for Dublin, it is also ritzy and highly, highly congested. However they do have good schools, but I would venture to say no better than the other school districts I mentioned. The only thing that puts them ahead is money. Now, all of that aside. I would not recommend that you move to Groveport, Grove City, Reynoldsburg, or anywhere that will send your children to Columbus Public. It's not that they are horribly-awful places, it's just that there are much better places to live around here.
Hope this helps ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would agree-Worthington is not known for being "snooty". However, as someone else said, Columbus suburbs do tend to talk unfavorably about each other. Every suburb has an understood label..a stereotype already put on them. I will also warn you, that every district that contains more than one high school, will tell you that they have a "rich" side and a "poor" side to it, and that the schools are favored more in one direction.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
look at Grandview Heights. It's got the old homes, tree lined streets a nice little strip with coffee shops, etc. I've lived in Cols 14 years and lived all over the city and Grandview Heights is the best in my opinion. They have excellent schools and taxes aren't much higher than the city of Cols taxes (in fact, they might be the same so you'd want to check) If the husb is going to work out of the home, you want the home to be in a nice place and not a pop up development neighborhood. Grove City is also known as Grove-tucky (due to being like Kentucky) It's a little, for lack of a better word, hick. Or hicks who have a little money, but still hicks. They have a waffle house on their main strip....need I say more?
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|