|

03-06-2009, 07:25 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: cleveland
553 posts, read 494,372 times
Reputation: 122
|
|
|
sorry, but when it comes to metro-parks columbus area parks offer little. your better off driving the hr or so to a national park.
|
|

03-06-2009, 09:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
50 posts, read 21,815 times
Reputation: 27
|
|
|
Columbus isn't the flattest city in the US, but I am pretty sure we all realize that it is nothing like San Fransisco. I am not really sure what the point of this thread is but if you head West on 70, starting around Zanesville, pass through Columbus and drive till you hit Denver, it's pretty flat the entire way. I have made the drive through Kansas at least 10 times, I would have to argue that is one of the flattest places I have ever been. Although again, not sure that is always a bad thing, works out pretty well for the great plains farmers!
|
|

03-06-2009, 10:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
54 posts, read 31,439 times
Reputation: 26
|
|
Having a relatively flat city isn't a bad thing. We have some terrain relief but yea it's nothing like Pittsburgh for eaxmple.. and flatter terrain means better gas milage 
I'd rather drive on snow in flat land than snow up a mountain anyday.
Also I grew up in the mountains and it sucks you look out your windows and see a mountain you don't see the sky... you have to look up to see the sky.... I like a nice clear horizon
|
|

03-06-2009, 05:31 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento
9,797 posts, read 5,100,042 times
Reputation: 2058
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1watertiger
sorry, but when it comes to metro-parks columbus area parks offer little. your better off driving the hr or so to a national park.
|
Inniswood Park, Westerville, is absolutely beautiful.
|
|

03-07-2009, 07:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
81 posts, read 62,071 times
Reputation: 20
|
|
|
I think when people think of a "metro park" they are thinking of something that is big with lots of recreational facilities, like golf courses, boating, horseback riding, miles of biking trails, etc. Metroparks in other larger metropolitan areas are like this, but the "metro parks" in Columbus do not fit this definition, although Inniswood Park is very pretty, I agree, but not a "metropark" as many people define it.
|
|

03-07-2009, 05:45 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento
9,797 posts, read 5,100,042 times
Reputation: 2058
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmargaret
I think when people think of a "metro park" they are thinking of something that is big with lots of recreational facilities, like golf courses, boating, horseback riding, miles of biking trails, etc. Metroparks in other larger metropolitan areas are like this, but the "metro parks" in Columbus do not fit this definition, although Inniswood Park is very pretty, I agree, but not a "metropark" as many people define it.
|
OK, I was basing my comment on the listing of metro parks for Columbus.
Actually, we enjoyed walking through both Inniswood and Batelle Darby Creek metro parks. When I had small kids, we enjoyed taking them over to Homestead Park over in Hilliard. Looking at the parks systems, perhaps the compendium of state parks and the multiple municipality metro parks is what provides a better overview of park opportunities in greater Columbus.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|