Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-13-2017, 10:04 AM
 
5,460 posts, read 7,760,530 times
Reputation: 4631

Advertisements

Does anyone know if Windows Server 2016 is compatible with internal SATA hard drives? I know from researching online that ATA and PATA hard drives are incompatible, and I believe that I saw one online reference that said that for Server 2016, Microsoft recommends PCI Express-based hard drives(?), but I can't recall anything specifically mentioning that SATA (i.e., with an "S") hard drives were incompatible?

Also if SATA drives are incompatible with Windows Server 2016, what would be the next-best, compatible HD solution? I have an HP xw8600 workstation running an older version of Windows Server, currently with a 250 GB SATA HDD, with two 3.40GHz Xeon 5492 processors installed, and 32 GB RAM. I am interested in trying to upgrade Windows Server 2012 to Server 2016, but if my existing SATA drive is not compatible with Server 2016, I am trying to figure out what I can replace the SATA drive with to ensure full compatibility. Also, my current, in-depth technical knowledge of server hardware specs is rather limited/basic, so sorry and my apologies in advance if this seems at all like a dumb question, etc.

Last edited by Phoenix2017; 01-13-2017 at 10:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2017, 10:21 AM
 
2,360 posts, read 1,914,836 times
Reputation: 2118
We run sata on all our servers that run windows server 2012 r2. so not sure why it would be any differant on the 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 11:11 AM
 
5,460 posts, read 7,760,530 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitpausebutton2 View Post
We run sata on all our servers that run windows server 2012 r2. so not sure why it would be any differant on the 2016.
Thanks for your helpful feedback and input. I got the info about ATA/PATA/SATA(?) from the excerpted quote from the link below, regarding Windows Server 2016 System Requirements:


https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/...m-requirements


Quote:
Storage controller and disk space requirements

Computers that run Windows Server 2016 must include a storage adapter that is compliant with the PCI Express architecture specification. Persistent storage devices on servers classified as hard disk drives must not be PATA. Windows Server 2016 does not allow ATA/PATA/IDE/EIDE for boot, page, or data drives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Mount Laurel
4,187 posts, read 11,929,395 times
Reputation: 3514
Your current SATA drive is currently on a PCI express compliant disk controller so you will be fine running Server 2016. Just curious.. Are you running Windows Server for testing purpose? Reason I asked is running a server with a single 250GB drive?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 11:26 AM
 
5,460 posts, read 7,760,530 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj08054 View Post
Your current SATA drive is currently on a PCI express compliant disk controller so you will be fine running Server 2016. Just curious.. Are you running Windows Server for testing purpose? Reason I asked is running a server with a single 250GB drive?
Many thanks for the helpful response, I appreciate it!

In response to your question: yes I am running Windows Server as a testing box for IT training, keeping up with the latest Server technologies, etc. purposes; tbh it is more of a personal workstation running Server instead of Windows 10, rather than say for example a true server.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2017, 11:31 AM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,596,756 times
Reputation: 2398
storage is storage, there has been no serious changes in pci-e arch in a while too just faster sata , sata kind of got rid of ide, eventually something will get rid of sata (like when we finally merge ram/storage, which would be more efficient across the board-then merge these 2 and get them closer to the cpu for even better efficiency)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2017, 06:20 PM
 
2,360 posts, read 1,914,836 times
Reputation: 2118
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleh View Post
storage is storage, there has been no serious changes in pci-e arch in a while too just faster sata , sata kind of got rid of ide, eventually something will get rid of sata (like when we finally merge ram/storage, which would be more efficient across the board-then merge these 2 and get them closer to the cpu for even better efficiency)
Well its on the right path..

https://www.slashgear.com/ibms-3-bit...lash-18440434/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2017, 02:27 PM
 
Location: McAllen, TX
5,947 posts, read 5,475,528 times
Reputation: 6747
This is what the specs say.

Quote:
Windows Server 2016 does not allow ATA/PATA/IDE/EIDE for boot, page, or data drives.
from this page.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/...m-requirements

It does not include SATA, so it does work with that. I would say that most drives in use in PC's these days are SATA.

So in this case since Server 2016 directly communicates with the BIOS via UEFI just like Windows 10, storage is not storage. Actually Server 2016 is based on Win10 much like Server 2008 R2 is based on Win7.

Unified Extensible Firmware Interface

UEFI only applies to newer hardware.

What You Need to Know About Using UEFI Instead of the BIOS

Last edited by gguerra; 01-19-2017 at 02:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2017, 03:25 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,701,807 times
Reputation: 25616
If your computer sees the drive, no reason Windows can't see it. 2016 s hardly that much newer or changed from 2012. It's based on Windows 10 kernel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2017, 02:31 PM
 
3,886 posts, read 3,504,464 times
Reputation: 5295
The type of hdd that can be used is a function of the MOBO as well as the OS. I'd argue that the MOBO has the biggest impact. Often drives run through a secondary controller can't be boot drives, but best to check your MOBO documentation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top