Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2014, 04:06 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,720,028 times
Reputation: 13892

Advertisements

Does anyone know of a good freeware program that will convert OGG files to WAV or MP3? That absolutely, positively does not pollute your computer with adware/spyware of any kind?

I've been investigating this and it seems there's plenty out there - most that come with spyware garbage as the catch.

Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2014, 06:48 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Audacity or Foobar2000.

Be aware that converting/recompressing compressed formats is not ideal. You're going to lose a little bit every time, it's all down hill once compressed. Think of this image as your audio with each red oval representing it being recompressed. The last circle is compressed once, the first one 10 times.



I have better examples with video but Peregrine will make fun of me.

Converting them to WAV will not have any affect however

ogg >> wav >> mp3

is the same affect as

ogg >> mp3

..........

original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> mp3 = ideal method
original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> ogg = ideal method


original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> ogg >> = bad method
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 07:03 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,720,028 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Audacity or Foobar2000.

Be aware that converting/recompressing compressed formats is not ideal. You're going to lose a little bit every time, it's all down hill once compressed. Think of this image as your audio with each red oval representing it being recompressed. The last circle is compressed once, the first one 10 times.



I have better examples with video but Peregrine will make fun of me.

Converting them to WAV will not have any affect however

ogg >> wav >> mp3

is the same affect as

ogg >> mp3

..........

original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> mp3 = ideal method
original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> ogg = ideal method


original uncompressed source(CD, wav, flac) >> ogg >> = bad method
Thanks for your reply.

Now that I know that my MP3 player will also play WAV files, OGG to WAV is the only way I need to go. So have you used your suggestions and know first-hand that they are completely free of adware/spyware?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 08:36 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
I'm not guaranteeing anything but I've used both for more than a decade, both are solid projects that have been around for a very long time and well known in the audio community.

As far as wav goes you're going to be creating huge files, it's something like 10 MB per minute. Does your player support anything else like flac?

If file size becomes a concern and mp3 is the only other option use a really high bitrate MP3 @320kbps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 10:58 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,720,028 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
I'm not guaranteeing anything but I've used both for more than a decade, both are solid projects that have been around for a very long time and well known in the audio community.

As far as wav goes you're going to be creating huge files, it's something like 10 MB per minute. Does your player support anything else like flac?

If file size becomes a concern and mp3 is the only other option use a really high bitrate MP3 @320kbps.
Thanks again. Audacity was the ticket and did exactly what I needed it to, both as a player and converter.

Yes, the WAV files are big, but I've got lots of room on my MP3 player and I can hear the sound quality difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,862 posts, read 24,111,507 times
Reputation: 15135
You should look into FLAC and/or lossless WMA, if your player can handle those formats.

Also, as a converter, I recommend dBpoweramp. Not free, but extremely fast and simple to use (right-click, convert), and worth every penny if you have a lot of files to convert or you do it on an ongoing basis.

Finally, take a good listen to some higher bit rate MP3s (256k+). Unless your hearing (and concentration) is absolutely perfect, I think you'd be hard pressed to hear a difference between an MP3 encoded at 320k and an original source file/disc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 02:50 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post

Yes, the WAV files are big, but I've got lots of room on my MP3 player and I can hear the sound quality difference.
You're not going to hear any difference converting OGG to WAV. Any loss in quality when using a compressed format is gone for good. You're not going to lose any quality either. They should sound exactly the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 03:08 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,720,028 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
You're not going to hear any difference converting OGG to WAV. Any loss in quality when using a compressed format is gone for good. You're not going to lose any quality either. They should sound exactly the same.
That's not the comparison I'm making. I'm talking about the difference between the WAV file and most of the rest of the MP3s on my player.

As I said, I've got plenty of room there....with precious little new music appearing these days worth saving space for. So there's no reason to compress the file and lose anything at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 03:22 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
You should look into FLAC and/or lossless WMA, if your player can handle those formats.
I forgot about lossless WMA, the player probably supports that.


Quote:
Finally, take a good listen to some higher bit rate MP3s (256k+). Unless your hearing (and concentration) is absolutely perfect, I think you'd be hard pressed to hear a difference between an MP3 encoded at 320k and an original source file/disc.
I'd agree for the most part but the more you step on it the worse it gets. I like to use these screenshots to illustrate the point (yep here they come again Peregrine). It appplicable here because lossy formats for audio, video and images all use the same type of compression schemes.

We have a high quality DV source:


Here is is encoded to 8000kbps mpeg, it doesn't look much different than the source. If you look at the edges of the lights they aren't quite as sharp. You'd never notice this when watching these two side by side.

DV >> 8000kbps mpeg



To force macroblocking I use 3000kbps bitrate which is far too low for this resolution when using MPEG2 especially with the lights which is where the macroblocking occurs since they are moving really fast.

DV >> 3000kbps mpeg




That's bad but if we introduce one intermediate conversion it gets really bad. Converting from the 8000 kbps mpeg which really doesn't look that bad on face value gives you this mess.

DV-AVI > >8000kbps mpeg >> 3000kbps mpeg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 03:32 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
That's not the comparison I'm making. I'm talking about the difference between the WAV file and most of the rest of the MP3s on my player.
See if your player supports lossless WMA, that wold really be the way to go because it's as good as WAV but half the file size. Lossless formats like WMA and Flac use compression but it's a lossless compression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top