Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-08-2007, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
9,885 posts, read 14,223,217 times
Reputation: 10929

Advertisements

Good afternoon all.

I live in Stamford, CT and have noticed how easily developers have it, when demolishing offices, buildings, and other structures for their desired projects.
There are several now-vacant tracts of land in or near downtown that did have "coming soon" signs posted, all of the buildings were bulldozed, and now the land has sat and sat for months--if not years.

Is this simply a case of Stamford's zoning laws/developers' rights being very flexible with the bulldozer--so-to-speak?? I mean, what's the history? I know downtown Stamford has been largely razed over the course of the past 40 or 50 years, to make way for the current "large corporate highrise" presence.

The tract of land at Washington Blvd going south towards UCONN on the west side is one example. Another example is the much, much-delayed (almost defunct) Highgrove project downtown. There's also the infamous "hole in the ground" across from the mall.

It seems like developers/builders can get an idea, draft some plans, get some financing, "rev" up the bulldozers, and *boom* the land can just sit.
What's the story? Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2007, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,682 posts, read 56,465,514 times
Reputation: 11156
Not sure what the story is in Stamford. Sometimes it is just the market conditions or financing. A lot of developers have been hit from both sides with rising financing costs and rising construction costs. Projects are started thinking there is enough money but them is halted when the construciton costs are a LOT higher than expected. Steel price have risen a lot in recent years because China has been taking most of the steel production for its projects. The developers could be just trying to find additional finnancing for their projects. Maybe someone from the Stamford area could comment on the specific project mentions. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2007, 03:51 PM
 
575 posts, read 3,123,825 times
Reputation: 278
Don't forget, the owners will pay less in property tax without a building on the land, rather than with it on so they will be quick to demolish, as for why they sit vacant and for how long..well nobody can say for sure..timing? Financing? Markets for properties, tenant fall throughs. etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top