Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Tolland, Connecticut
691 posts, read 1,142,922 times
Reputation: 491

Advertisements

As someone relatively new to the Hartford Metro, I'm curious about the 84 HOV lanes and the plan behind them.

How big of an issue was the 84 traffic east of the river prior to them being built in the 80's?

How connected to the growth of Buckland was the 84 expansion project?

The HOV lanes dont really seem necessary today, as rush hour traffic flows pretty smoothly east of the river, in general. Is this due to economic growth in the region not living up to projections?

I know the HOV originally ended in East Hartford, thereby leaving Hartford commuters to merge back into the regular lanes and sit in traffic. However, this is no longer an issue, as one coming from east of the river can exit at route 2 and use surface streets for a bit to get to one of the big insurance employers pretty easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Danbury, CT
186 posts, read 310,572 times
Reputation: 49
Well, you can easily fit 2 lanes if those HOV lanes are removed. I-84 from Manchester to the CT 15 is 12 lanes. That can be increased to 14 if the HOV is removed. Yes, traffic in East Hartford isn't really that bad, but some days, I-84 west can be slow heading through Downtown Hartford. IMO, that stretch to me is overbuilt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 12:00 PM
 
2,601 posts, read 3,373,809 times
Reputation: 2395
Quote:
Originally Posted by theguyfrompluto View Post
Well, you can easily fit 2 lanes if those HOV lanes are removed. I-84 from Manchester to the CT 15 is 12 lanes. That can be increased to 14 if the HOV is removed. Yes, traffic in East Hartford isn't really that bad, but some days, I-84 west can be slow heading through Downtown Hartford. IMO, that stretch to me is overbuilt.
Removing hov lanes doesn't solve any problems because you still have a bottleneck where the highway reduces a few lanes though downtown hartford. That's what causes the traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 12:34 PM
 
4,709 posts, read 5,913,501 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by pulpfiction View Post
As someone relatively new to the Hartford Metro, I'm curious about the 84 HOV lanes and the plan behind them.

How big of an issue was the 84 traffic east of the river prior to them being built in the 80's?

How connected to the growth of Buckland was the 84 expansion project?

The HOV lanes dont really seem necessary today, as rush hour traffic flows pretty smoothly east of the river, in general. Is this due to economic growth in the region not living up to projections?

I know the HOV originally ended in East Hartford, thereby leaving Hartford commuters to merge back into the regular lanes and sit in traffic. However, this is no longer an issue, as one coming from east of the river can exit at route 2 and use surface streets for a bit to get to one of the big insurance employers pretty easily.
I think the HOV lanes were originally thought to be something that would be heavily used and would alleviate traffic problems east of Hartford - East Hartford, South Windsor, Manchester, Vernon/Rockville, and the suburbs off the highway (north Glastonbury, Ellington, Tolland, etc)

However, people were very hesitant to embrace them, preferring to stick to the busier interstate rather than switching over to the HOV lane. I think there were a few reasons: (1) Connecticut is still somewhat "The Land of Steady Habits" and this was change; (2) People feared they would be stuck behind Ma & Pa Kettle on their weekly trip to the market, driving 40mph in the HOV lane when the heavy traffic on the actual highway was moving 45-50; (3) The HOV lanes originally required three people to be in the vehicle, and there simply were not that many people that drove with two other people in the car with them. My parents would drive to work together and my dad would drop my mom off each day for well over 10 years together, but it was rare that there was another person in the car with them - only when I was doing a summer internship in college; and (4) And, not many people were willing to add another one or two passengers into the mix to get to 3 people in the vehicle (which is an offshoot of (1) and (3)).

They later changed it to only require two people in the vehicle, but I think it was too late by then...they were already seen as a failure that nobody used. I think the original plan was to see how they worked out east of Hartford, and then expand them west of Hartford, as well as South & North of Hartford.

When I lived in Ellington, I would use them semi-regularly. However, I was driving a Honda Odyssey mini-van at the time. The minivan had pretty dark "privacy" glass in the back, and several times I was stopped by police trying to ticket me for not having a second person in the car... until I pointed out to them my infant daughter in her car seat in the back (and, sometimes my wife would be in back with our daughter, too.) If the cops are also going to make it a pain in the rear end to even use the HOV lanes, many people won't even bother the next time. I never got a ticket, but it's still a pain in the neck to be stopped continually.

Last edited by NewJeffCT; 01-11-2014 at 12:42 PM.. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,634 posts, read 56,360,262 times
Reputation: 11145
Back when ConnDOT was planning for the expansion of I-84 east of Hartford, the Federal Highway Administration made it clear that they did not just want an expansion of the mainline highway and that ConnDOT had to plan for more mass transit. Thus the HOV lanes were added to the project.

I will say that the lanes were not very well thought out though. They are not easily accessible and did not really connect well with the facilities they should have beendesigned to serve. The large commuter parking lot at Buckland Street is not convenient to the lanes, nor is the entrances to Pratt & Whitney off Silver Lane. There was no access to or from the Charter Oak Bridge (and thus I-91 south of Hartford) and the lanes originally ended well short of downtown Hartford. Since then the lanes have been modified and access is now provided to Charter Oak and to the Founders Bridge.

Studies have shown however that the lanes are well used during peak hours despite appearing empty. Rather than looking at the number of vehicles in the lanes, you need to lok at how many people they carry which you will find is significant. If the lanes were eliminated and converted to travel lanes (which would be impossible to do environmentally) you would see that the highway would actually not work as well. This is true of the I-91 HOV lanes north of Hartford as well.

There are thoughts to include the lanes in some type of future rapid bus system. Once CTfastrak is running, a similar system may be implemented along the HOV lanes as well. But first we need to see how well that system is received. Jay

Moderator's Note: Please do not use this thread to begin complaining about the busway project. I will delete any off topic discussions. JayCT Moderator
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top