Quote:
Originally Posted by skytrekker
I look at economics; demographics and factors like debt. Under the republicans and conservatives we have had 30 plus years of trickle up economics where the lower and middle classed have subsidized the wealthy- just the opposite of the period from 1932-1968.
With an aging demographic huge tax giveaways to the wealthy and corporate monoliths- It seems hard for me at least to see a future based on more asset bubbles and mass consumerism. With a society deep i debt with low savings.
|
You can't reply without getting partisan and political can you?
Okay I'll bite a little bit without getting this too heated...
Before those "trickle DOWN" policies when
Democrat Jimmy Carter was in office, home mortgage rates were at 15.25% on average and the prime rate peaked at -
21%! Can you imagine if the prime rate was 21% today! The payment on a $200,000 mortgage back then was $2,933 --compared to less than $1,200 at today's rates.
Prices increased 40% in just three years, from 1979 to 1981.
Inflation was about 13%
Unemployment was between 7.5 -10%
Fuel ration lines were common with people pushing their cars the last mile to the line to the pump.
Ahhh the good old days...yea that Reagan really did us wrong!
And lets not forget those "evil" corporations are what give most people a paycheck to raise their family.
It's a FACT that the "wealthy" pay the lion share of the tax burden. If they did not, you would not be able to afford to live. So what do you want to do, tax them more!
For instance, in 2001 the top 50% of wage earners paid 96.03% of income taxes. Ouch. The top 1% is paying more than ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%!
You believe in socialism. The redistribution of "wealth". OVER tax the Rich, and give it to the poor. That is a system that has never worked for the "greater good" of it's people in the history of this planet.
Do I think the "rich" should give back? Yes. But VOLUNTARILY. I dare say that pre "New Deal" the rich invested much much much more heavily into our infrastructure on a private basis. Just look at NYC for instance with places like Rockefeller center and all they did for the city because their tax burden was not unfairly forced upon them.
Personally, I support a flat tax. You earn it you pay it by percentage.
So if you blame the last 30 years of "conservatives" for a current economic downturns, you are sorely mistake and have spent much to much time in the Koolaid tank...next your going to tell me Bill Clinton (Who was in office in the last 30 years) is a conservative too or that Media Matters is an unbiased news source.
I know you'll come back with web links, facts and some kind of statistical data that proves your point...that stuff is everywhere to agree with whatever your viewpoint is.
The fact is, before Reagan the REAL WORLD was exactly what I posted and we are FAR FAR FAR from that right now - unless you doom and gloomers continue to scare everyone that the sky is falling until it becomes a reality.
/political rant.