U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 02-14-2008, 10:24 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
164 posts, read 193,070 times
Reputation: 51
jad2000 will become famous soon enoughjad2000 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by JViello View Post
I would agree with you also.

IMHO the change REALLY starts at Stamford and *slightly* at Norwalk.

With family from Sheepshead Bay NY to Manchester CT I too have spent much time along the corridor.

Culturewise it may be different, but the topograhy is distinctly New England.

Remember these towns were established when it took 1-2 hours to travel 10 miles.
If you travel along the back roads of the northern and eastern Westchester County towns, you will notice that they are very New England.

I would actually agree that Putnam County does have a different look, but the small towns in Westchester are much like Fairfield and New Haven Counties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2008, 12:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tolland County- Northeastern CT
4,454 posts, read 1,942,651 times
Reputation: 1237
skytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud ofskytrekker has much to be proud of
Send a message via Yahoo to skytrekker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Lee View Post
...and the population density of New Jersey is more dense. Does that mean New Jersey (OML, their ZIP codes start with a "0", too) is now part of New England?

Population densities for certain states:
1138.0 New Jersey
1003.2 Rhode Island
809.8 Massachusetts
702.9 Connecticut
541.9 Maryland
401.9 New York
401.1 Delaware
274.0 Pennsylvania
137.8 New Hampshire
88.6 Washington
65.8 Vermont
41.3 Maine
35.6 Oregon

Looking at this list, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine have extremely low population densities. Again, maybe they should be considered part of another region, perhaps the Pacific Northwest?
Those population densities are fine statistics- again we are comparing geographic regions of western CT and eastern NY. PA, Oregon, Maine, Maryland mean nothing, if comparing them to western CT and extreme eastern NY. They geographically are not important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top