II. My Summary
Thus...my general feeling is:
-Fairfield County-NY sports country with hardly any Boston presence since it's less than 30 miles at points to NYC.
-New Haven County-Strong NY sports country...increasing Boston presence to the North and East...but towns in the New Haven region including Madison are much more in favor of NY.
-Litchfield...rural...but NY sports territory...maybe indifferent to an extent due to rural and tourist quality.
-Middlesex...slight edge to NY.
-Hartford....50/50...points north and east more Boston...points south and west...more NY.
-Tolland.....BOS preference but a good NY presence.
-New London/Windham....BOS country but not quite the partisanship Fairfield has towards NY.
III. Questions Part I
1) Am I correct..does this accurately portray?
2) If yes...then why is the recent CT poll claiming CT is slightly pro Red Sox?
Is this strictly bandwagon…because the US seems to have a lot more Red Sox fans in general these days…much like they were loaded with Braves fans in the 90s. This makes me wonder if the 2003 data is really more representative of CT…which falls in line with what I feel to make most sense..and the gains of 2008 is just like any popular bandwagon team would make.
3) Further...why is it this map shows all but one small blurb of CT to be pro Boston....in all sports.
Is this accurate or a gross misrepresentation?
CommonCensus Sports Map Project
4) What I really do not understand is the following:
-Why New Haven county claimed to have only an 8% edge for NY..when logically you'd figure it be way higher?
-Why Litchfield claimed to have an edge for Boston...when again logic indicates as stated above it would be for NY?
-Why Middlesex had a slight Boston edge...when you figured it'd be a slight NY edge?
-Why Hartford had a 50-30 edge over NY..when logic figures it would be 50/50 since it's halfway between both cities?
-Why Tolland/New London/Windham had a 60-23 edge over NY..almost what Fairfield has over BOS...when you figure E CT wouldn't be pro BOS to THAT extent since it is not part of the BOS region like Fairfield is to NYC?
Can someone explain?
-Is this just a big flawed data sample by the pollsters...because it makes ZERO sense that Boston would have this much of an advantage in CT when NYC is just as if not closer and is the bigger city influential wise as the CT Poll and CommonCensus make it appear.
5) A couple of things in the article which really bothered me was how the Red Sox have been aggressively campaigning to annex Southern CT.
To me, again, this area is/should be solid NY Country because it's a heck of a lot more like the tri state region and connected than it is to Bos/MA culture.
I find it to be encroachment on the Red Sox that they now have radio affiliates in Hamden and Greenwich.
I don't get why they feel that just because CT is part of NE...that CTers should be Boston fans?
What sense does that make if you can get to NYC in 30 mins from Greenwich?
Didn't the Red Sox front office ever hear of the tri state region...which includes Southern and Western CT?
I was furious to read they took a group of middle schoolers from West Haven on a tour of Fenway to win them over.
This outrageous...when West Haven is well in the tri state region..and nothing like Puritan Mass.
I really am outraged at the arrogance of Theo Epstein and Lucchino who seem to feel anything with a CT zip code is there territory.
I really hope CTers aren't gullible enough to fall for this.
What do you make of this...and do you think future generations will see it be more of a Red Sox state...or is the poll just very fickle?
6) Is there any similar poll about CT and the NFL/NHL/NBA?
-Do they follow similar patterns to MLB?
Thanks...I look forward to full detailed answers from objective and familiar CTers.