Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, there is not a court in the United States that will agree with you on this. Furthermore considering that there are no appeals, it seems even the accusers have decided the Jury did it's job.
You can believe as you wish, but it's not based in reality or the facts at hand.
Well, there is not a court in the United States that will agree with you on this. Furthermore considering that there are no appeals, it seems even the accusers have decided the Jury did it's job.
You can believe as you wish, but it's not based in reality or the facts at hand.
Just because the jury did its job, does not mean the jury made the correct decision and we can stamp a gigantic "INNOCENT" gold star on GZ's chest. But that is how our justice system works. We are tried before a jury of our peers. Sometimes it goes awry.
Does not mean the jury made the correct decision ....
GZ is innocent of the charges. No appeals, Jury made correct decision. Your opinion of the Jury is irrelevant in the matter. Some would say it would even fall into the category of delusional.
You gave a different situation than what was asked. If you preform (sic) in your job this way, I suspect you would have been fired by now.
Now who is attacking who instead of just "discussing the topic?"
LMAO! The difference is I don't get all butt hurt about it. You mentioned the Rascal scooter twice while whining ... do you really have one? Did I hit the nail on the head with a lucky guess?
GZ is innocent of the charges. No appeals, Jury made correct decision. Your opinion of the Jury is irrelevant in the matter. Some would say it would even fall into the category of delusional.
LMAO! Again that's your opinion. And there's a lot of delusional people out there who agree with me. Many more than just robotically think, "Jury good. Jury know all. Jury speak perfect truth." I bet it's at least 80% of the population who agree with my opinion of how this turned out, not yours.
Now who is attacking who instead of just "discussing the topic?" ...
No attack. I was pointing out that you did not answer the question that was asked. And rather than saying you don't want to answer it, you simply made up a different question, answered that, then said the request was satisfied.
In business this will get you fired. If you don't believe that, then I suspect you don't hold a job. It's a statement of fact about your actions. It's not a personal attack on who you are. There is a big difference.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
